Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 444


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 No. C 12-1971 CW Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL (Docket No. 425) Defendants. ________________________________/ 15 On August 8, 2013, the Court denied without prejudice 16 Plaintiff’s and Defendants’ administrative motions to file under 17 seal, finding, among other things, that the justification for 18 filing the Patent License and Settlement Agreement (License) 19 between Plaintiff and Microsoft was “not sufficient to file the 20 entire document under seal.” 21 Court directed Plaintiff to file a renewed motion to file the 22 unredacted License under seal and prepare a redacted version of 23 the License for the public record. 24 Docket No. 422. In its order, the Plaintiff has filed a renewed motion to file the unredacted 25 License under seal, indicating that only the sealable portions of 26 the License have been redacted from the version prepared for the 27 public record. 28 finding that disclosure of the redacted portions of the License Plaintiff has submitted a declaration supporting a 1 (1) could put Plaintiff and non-party Microsoft at a competitive 2 disadvantage in future negotiations and (2) would disclose 3 confidential information regarding Plaintiff’s bank account. 4 5 Plaintiff’s renewed motion to file the License under seal is GRANTED. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Dated: 11/5/2013 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?