Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
444
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 425 RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
No. C 12-1971 CW
Plaintiff,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, et
al.,
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S
RENEWED
ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL
(Docket No. 425)
Defendants.
________________________________/
15
On August 8, 2013, the Court denied without prejudice
16
Plaintiff’s and Defendants’ administrative motions to file under
17
seal, finding, among other things, that the justification for
18
filing the Patent License and Settlement Agreement (License)
19
between Plaintiff and Microsoft was “not sufficient to file the
20
entire document under seal.”
21
Court directed Plaintiff to file a renewed motion to file the
22
unredacted License under seal and prepare a redacted version of
23
the License for the public record.
24
Docket No. 422.
In its order, the
Plaintiff has filed a renewed motion to file the unredacted
25
License under seal, indicating that only the sealable portions of
26
the License have been redacted from the version prepared for the
27
public record.
28
finding that disclosure of the redacted portions of the License
Plaintiff has submitted a declaration supporting a
1
(1) could put Plaintiff and non-party Microsoft at a competitive
2
disadvantage in future negotiations and (2) would disclose
3
confidential information regarding Plaintiff’s bank account.
4
5
Plaintiff’s renewed motion to file the License under seal is
GRANTED.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Dated: 11/5/2013
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?