Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 530

AMENDED ORDER granting in part and denying in part Digital Reg's 504 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on March 14, 2014. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 United States District Court Northern District of California 3 4 5 6 DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC, Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, VALVE CORPORATION, ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., UBISOFT, INC., SYMANTEC CORPORATION, AVG TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC., ZYNGA, INC., and INTUIT INC., Defendant. 13 Case No.: CV 12-01971-CW (KAW) AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11 FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT UBISOFT’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXHIBITS 7 TO 19 OF THE DECLARATION OF W. PAUL SCHUCK 14 (Dkt. No. 504) 15 16 17 On February 21, 2014, Plaintiff Digital Reg of Texas, LLC (“Digital Reg”) filed a motion 18 for administrative relief to file documents under seal in support of its response to Defendant 19 20 Ubisoft, Inc.’s motion to strike. (Dkt. No. 504.) As to Plaintiff’s request to file the unredacted version of its response under seal, the Court 21 GRANTS that request pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5. 22 As to filing exhibits 7 to 19 under seal in their entirety, the Court GRANTS IT IN PART 23 AND DENIES IT IN PART as set forth below: 24 1. Plaintiff’s request to completely seal Exhibit Nos. 7-17 is DENIED. Plaintiff 25 appears to attach documents that have already been provided by Ubisoft in a redacted format, and 26 Plaintiff has provided no support for why the entire exhibits should be filed under seal versus 27 being redacted. 28 Plaintiff’s request to seal Exhibit Nos. 18 and 19 is GRANTED. 1 2. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED.1 3 DATE: March 14, 2014 ___________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 This order is amended to exclude the language, which was included in the Court's prior order, regarding General Order 62. General Order 62 was abrogated as of October 1, 2013. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?