Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
530
AMENDED ORDER granting in part and denying in part Digital Reg's 504 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on March 14, 2014. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2014)
1
2
United States District Court
Northern District of California
3
4
5
6
DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
VALVE CORPORATION, ELECTRONIC
ARTS INC., UBISOFT, INC., SYMANTEC
CORPORATION, AVG TECHNOLOGIES
USA, INC., ZYNGA GAME NETWORK
INC., ZYNGA, INC., and INTUIT INC.,
Defendant.
13
Case No.: CV 12-01971-CW (KAW)
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF
DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC’S MOTION
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11 FOR
LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
UNREDACTED RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT UBISOFT’S MOTION TO
STRIKE AND EXHIBITS 7 TO 19 OF THE
DECLARATION OF W. PAUL SCHUCK
14
(Dkt. No. 504)
15
16
17
On February 21, 2014, Plaintiff Digital Reg of Texas, LLC (“Digital Reg”) filed a motion
18
for administrative relief to file documents under seal in support of its response to Defendant
19
20
Ubisoft, Inc.’s motion to strike. (Dkt. No. 504.)
As to Plaintiff’s request to file the unredacted version of its response under seal, the Court
21
GRANTS that request pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5.
22
As to filing exhibits 7 to 19 under seal in their entirety, the Court GRANTS IT IN PART
23
AND DENIES IT IN PART as set forth below:
24
1.
Plaintiff’s request to completely seal Exhibit Nos. 7-17 is DENIED. Plaintiff
25
appears to attach documents that have already been provided by Ubisoft in a redacted format, and
26
Plaintiff has provided no support for why the entire exhibits should be filed under seal versus
27
being redacted.
28
Plaintiff’s request to seal Exhibit Nos. 18 and 19 is GRANTED.
1
2.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.1
3
DATE: March 14, 2014
___________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
This order is amended to exclude the language, which was included in the Court's prior order,
regarding General Order 62. General Order 62 was abrogated as of October 1, 2013.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?