Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 575

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING UBISOFTS 502 MOTION TO FILE A THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AS MOOT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC, 5 6 7 8 9 Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., et al., No. C 12-1971 CW ORDER DENYING UBISOFT’S MOTION TO FILE A THIRDPARTY COMPLAINT AS MOOT (Docket No. 502) Defendants. ________________________________/ United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 On February 21, 2014, Defendant Ubisoft, Inc. moved for leave 12 to file a third-party complaint against former Defendant Valve 13 Corporation. 14 defending party to implead a third party who “may be liable to him 15 for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim against him.” 16 10, 2014, the Court granted summary judgment of non-infringement 17 as to all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Ubisoft. 18 Docket No. 574. 19 case, it would be improper to allow Ubisoft to file a third-party 20 complaint against Valve. 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14(a) permits only a On June See Because Ubisoft is no longer a defendant in this Ubisoft correctly notes that there is some factual overlap 22 between the present patent infringement case and Ubisoft’s third- 23 party claims seeking indemnification for costs occurred in 24 defending this case. 25 suit seeking indemnification from Valve and file a notice that the 26 27 28 Accordingly, Ubisoft may file a separate 1 case is related to the present case, which the Court will 2 consider. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6/12/2014 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?