Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
596
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 586 Motion to Dismiss Invalidity Counterclaims. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Eric A. Buresh (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
eric.buresh@eriseip.com
Michelle L. Marriott (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
michelle.marriott@eriseip.com
Mark C. Lang (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
mark.lang@eriseip.com
ERISE IP, P.A.
6201 College Boulevard, Suite 300
Overland Park, Kansas 66211
Phone:
(913) 777-5600
Facsimile: (913) 777-5601
Julie Turner (SBN 191146)
turner@turnerboyd.com
Turner Boyd LLP
702 Marshall Street, Suite 640
Redwood City, CA 94063
(650) 521-5930
Attorneys for Defendant
UBISOFT, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
13
14
15
DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
21
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
VALVE CORPORATION, ELECTRONIC
ARTS, INC., UBISOFT, INC., SYMANTEC
CORPORATION, INTUIT INC., ZYNGA
GAME NETWORK INC., AND ZYNGA, INC.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 12-CV-01971 CW (KAW)
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING
UBISOFT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION
TO DISMISS INVALIDITY
COUNTERCLAIMS
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION AND UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO DISMISS
-1-
CASE NO. 4:12-CV-01971 CW (KAW)
1
The Court, having considered Ubisoft’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Invalidity
2
Counterclaims, hereby ORDERS that Counts VII through XII set forth in Ubisoft’s Second
3
Amended Answer to Digital Reg’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 443) are dismissed
4
without prejudice.
5
Dated: 7/31/2014
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Court Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION AND UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO DISMISS
-2-
CASE NO. 4:12-CV-01971 CW (KAW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?