Copes
Filing
6
ORDER RECLASSIFYING CASE AND SETTING DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/18/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2012)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
OAKLAND DIVISION
6
7
No. C 12-2015 PJH (PR)
In re DONALE EUGENE COPES,
Plaintiff,
8
/
9
This case was opened when Copes wrote a letter to the court. In an effort to protect
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ORDER RECLASSIFYING
CASE AND SETTING
DEADLINE
his rights, it was treated as an attempt to open a new case. It was classified as a prisoner
12
civil rights case not involving conditions of confinement (nature of suit 550). However, in
13
the letter plaintiff clearly expresses his wish that the court order his release – that is, if
14
plaintiff intended to file a case at all, it would be a habeas case (nature of suit 530),
15
because it involves the fact or length of his confinement. The clerk therefore shall
16
reclassify the case on the docket as a 530.
17
The day the case was opened the clerk sent plaintiff two notices, one that he had not
18
paid the filing fee or applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and the other
19
that he had not filed a complaint. Included with the notices were the court’s form for IFP
20
applications and a prisoner civil rights form packet. He has returned a completed IFP form,
21
but not a complaint. Because this is in fact a habeas case, the complaint form would not be
22
suitable in any event, and it may have confused plaintiff. The clerk shall send plaintiff the
23
court’s form packet for habeas cases with his copy of this order. Plaintiff shall file a habeas
24
petition within twenty-eight days of the date this order is entered. If he does not, the case
25
will be dismissed.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 18, 2012.
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
28
G:\PRO-SE\PJH\CR.12\Copes2015.reclassify.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?