Raab v. Astrue

Filing 22

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/26/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2012)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

DANIEL JOSEPH RAAB,

6
7
8

No. C 12-02110 CW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING
PARTIES TO INFORM
COURT WHETHER THEY
CONSENT TO A
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR
ALL PURPOSES

v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

9

Defendant.
/

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the

12

parties may consent at any time to reassignment of the case to a

13

magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final

14

judgment.

15

See Civil L.R. 73-1(b).

Accordingly, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to advise the

16

Court, no later than 11/9/2012, as to whether they consent to have

17

a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant

18

action.1 For the parties' convenience, a consent form is attached

19

hereto; forms are also available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov,

20

in the "Forms" section.

21

may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.

22
23

The parties are further advised that they

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 26, 2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
1

28

Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the
Court in their Joint Case Management Statement filed in connection
with a case management conference.
Because the instant action
involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case
management conference has not been scheduled.