Raab v. Astrue
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/26/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANIEL JOSEPH RAAB,
No. C 12-02110 CW
PARTIES TO INFORM
COURT WHETHER THEY
CONSENT TO A
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the
parties may consent at any time to reassignment of the case to a
magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final
See Civil L.R. 73-1(b).
Accordingly, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to advise the
Court, no later than 11/9/2012, as to whether they consent to have
a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant
action.1 For the parties' convenience, a consent form is attached
hereto; forms are also available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov,
in the "Forms" section.
may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.
The parties are further advised that they
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 26, 2012
United States District Judge
Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the
Court in their Joint Case Management Statement filed in connection
with a case management conference.
Because the instant action
involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case
management conference has not been scheduled.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?