Ivy v. Paramo

Filing 25

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 24 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5

WILLIAM LEONARD IVY,
Petitioner,
v.

No. C 12-02195 YGR (PR)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

6
7

DANIEL PARAMO, Warden,
Respondent.

8

/

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

This matter came before the Court for consideration of Petitioner's pro se petition for a writ
of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his 2010 conviction. The petition was denied
on its merits. A certificate of appealability was denied in the Order denying the petition. See Rules
Governing Section 2254 Cases 11(a). The certificate of appealability was denied because "no
reasonable jurist would find the denial of his claims debatable or wrong." Slack v. McDaniel, 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Petitioner has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
appeal. For the same reason the Court denied Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability,
Petitioner's appeal is not taken in "good faith" and consequently leave to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis (Docket No. 24) is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:

February 26, 2014
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

G:\PRO-SE\YGR\HC.12\Ivy2195.denyAFP.wpd