The Burlington Insurance Company v. Maiden et al

Filing 43

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/18/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a North Carolina corporation, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BRAD MAIDEN, by and through CORA ) JEAN MAIDEN and/or ROD DUNCAN, his ) Guardian Ad Litem; JASMINE VILEY; and ) LINK BUSINESS AND PERSONNEL ) SERVICES, LLC, a California limited liability ) company. ) ) Defendants ) ) ) And related counterclaims. ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C12-02257-SBA ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Date Filed: May 4, 2012 Trial Date: October 28, 2013 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30596-39421 LAS 623860.1 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation For Dismissal of Action with Prejudice, the complaint and any 3 and all counterclaims in the above-captioned action are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to 4 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 5 The parties shall each bear its own fees and costs in connection with this action. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: 6/18/13 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30596-39421 LAS 623860.1 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?