Prospect Consulting Group LLC v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc.
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Settlement Conference Scheduling filed by Prospect Consulting Group LLC Settlement Conference set for 12/2/2013 01:00 PM.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/26/13. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
GREGORY K. KLINGSPORN (203649)
NICOLAS A. FLEGEL (229360)
JORGENSON, SIEGEL, McCLURE & FLEGEL, LLP
1100 Alma Street, Suite 210
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
(650) 324-9300
Facsimile:
(650) 324-0227
Email: gkk@jsmf.com
Email: naf@jsmf.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant
PROSPECT CONSULTING GROUP LLC
IVO LABAR (203492)
KELLY A. CORCORAN (260268)
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
100 Spear Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 371-8500
Facsimile: (415) 371-0500
Email: labar@kerrwagstaffe.com
Email: corcoran@kerrwagstaffe.com
Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant
ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
PROSPECT CONSULTING GROUP LLC, a
Wyoming Limited Liability Company
21
Plaintiff,
22
v.
23
24
25
ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC., a
Delaware corporation, and DOES 1-50,
inclusive,
Defendants
26
27
Case No.: C-12-2328-DMR
STIPULATION AND [Proposed]
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
SCHEDULING
Date:
Time:
Dec. 2, 2013
1:00 p.m.
Trial Date:
Dec. 9, 2013
Hon. Kandis A. Westmore
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION
28
Jorgenson, Siegel, McClure & Flegel LLP
Attorneys at Law
Menlo Park, CA
(650) 324-9300
Case No. C-12-2328-DMR
STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE SCHEDULING
1
1
The parties to this action, plaintiff and cross-defendant Prospect Consulting Group, LLC
2
(“PCG”) and defendant and cross-complainant Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (“EFI”), stipulate as
3
follows:
4
1.
A Settlement Conference in this action is currently scheduled for Wednesday,
5
November 27, 2013 at 11:00 a.m., and the parties have lodged and served their Settlement
6
Conference Statements;
7
8
2.
Trial in this action is currently scheduled to commence on Monday, December 9,
3.
On November 22, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request that Plaintiff’s representative be
2013;
9
10
permitted to attend the Settlement Conference telephonically, or that the Settlement Conference
11
be rescheduled to a date when Plaintiff’s representative could personally attend;
12
13
4.
Conference on Monday, December 2, 2013, at 1:00 p.m. or later; AND SO
14
15
Both parties and their counsel are available to personally attend a Settlement
5.
The parties jointly request that the Court reschedule the Settlement Conference to
December 2, 2013 at 1:00 p.m.
16
SO STIPULATED.
17
Dated: November 26, 2013
18
JORGENSON, SIEGEL,
McCLURE & FLEGEL, LLP
By:
19
20
21
Dated: November 26, 2013
/s/
Gregory K. Klingsporn
Attorneys for PROSPECT
CONSULTING GROUP, LLC
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
22
By
23
24
25
26
//
27
//
28
//
Jorgenson, Siegel, McClure & Flegel LLP
Attorneys at Law
Menlo Park, CA
(650) 324-9300
Case No. C-12-2328-DMR
STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE SCHEDULING
2
/s/
Kelly A. Corcoran
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.
1
ORDER
2
The Court having reviewed and considered the parties’ Stipulation Re: Settlement
3
Conference Scheduling, and good cause being shown, the Court HEREBY GRANTS the request.
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Settlement Conference in this action shall be held on
5
December 2, 2013 at 1:00 p.m., at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland California
6
94612.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 11/26/13
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jorgenson, Siegel, McClure & Flegel LLP
Attorneys at Law
Menlo Park, CA
(650) 324-9300
Case No. C-12-2328-DMR
STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE SCHEDULING
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?