Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Wood Valley Concrete, Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 8/15/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/22/2012 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 6/5/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 9 Plaintiff(s), No. C 12-02389 DMR ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE DONNA M. RYU v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 WOOD VALLEY CONCRETE INC, 12 13 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 14 15 16 17 18 19 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The above-entitled matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Donna M. Ryu for trial and all further proceedings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 and Civil L.R.16-10, that a Case 20 Management Conference shall be held in this case before the Honorable Donna M. Ryu on August 21 22, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California. For 22 courtroom number and floor information, please check the Court’s on-line calendar at 23 http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click “Calendars - Judges' Weekly Calendars” link, then select Judge 24 Ryu’s calendar) or call Judge Ryu’s Courtroom Deputy, Ivy Garcia, at (510) 637-3639, one week 25 prior to the scheduled hearing. 26 No later than July 25, 2012, the parties shall (1) meet and confer regarding Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 27 initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and a discovery plan; (2) file an ADR 28 Certification (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) signed by the parties and counsel 1 pursuant to A.D.R. L.R. 3-5(b); and (3) file either a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need 2 for ADR Phone Conference (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) pursuant to ADR L.R. 3 3-5(b) & (c). 4 5 No later than August 15, 2012, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement in conformance with Judge Ryu's attached Standing Order. 6 Plaintiff(s) shall serve copies of this Order on all parties to this action, and on any parties 7 subsequently joined, in accordance with the provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and 5. Following service, 8 Plaintiff(s) shall file a certificate of service with the Clerk of Court. and be assigned a user ID and password for access to the system upon designation of the action as 11 For the Northern District of California Each attorney of record in all "E-Filing" cases is obligated to become an ECF User 10 United States District Court 9 being subject to ECF. Registration shall be on a form prescribed by the Clerk. Attorneys of record 12 who fail to register timely shall be subject to such sanctions as may be imposed by the Court. 13 STANDING ORDER FOR 14 MAGISTRATE JUDGE DONNA M. RYU 15 (Revised February 22, 2011) 16 Parties shall comply with the procedures in the Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure, 17 the Northern District of California’s Local Rules and General Orders, and this standing order, all of 18 which are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. The parties’ failure to comply with any of the 19 rules or orders may be grounds for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of judgment, or other 20 appropriate sanctions. 21 CALENDAR DATES AND SCHEDULING 22 1. 23 a.m., or during the regular criminal calendar when Judge Ryu is on criminal calendar duty. Civil 24 motions are also heard on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month at 11:00 a.m. Civil case 25 management and status conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Civil pretrial 26 conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 3:00 p.m. 27 2. 28 Parties need not reserve a hearing date, but should confirm the Court’s availability at Criminal motions are heard on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month at 11:00 Parties should notice motions (other than discovery motions) pursuant to the local rules. http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. The Court may reset hearing dates as the Court’s calendar requires. 2 1 3. 2 637-3639. 3 For scheduling questions, please call Judge Ryu’s courtroom deputy, Ivy Garcia at (510) CONSENT CASES 4 4. 5 file their written consent to the assignment of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes or 6 their written declination of consent as soon as possible, and in no event later than the deadlines 7 specified in Civil L.R. 73-1(a)(1) and (2). 8 9 In civil cases that are randomly assigned to Judge Ryu for all purposes, the parties should CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS 5. Under Civil L.R. 5-1(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of any filing and mark it as a copy for “Chambers.” Please three-hole punch the chambers copy and submit it to the 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Oakland Clerk’s Office. In a case subject to electronic filing, chambers copies must be submitted by 12 the close of the next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. 13 6. 14 dmrpo@cand.uscourts.gov as a word processing attachment on the same day the document is e-filed. 15 This address should only be used for this stated purpose unless otherwise directed by the Court. 16 Any stipulation or proposed order in a case subject to e-filing should be submitted by email to CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT 17 7. 18 parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement in full compliance with the Northern District of 19 California’s general standing order for civil cases entitled “Contents of Joint Case Management 20 Statement,” a copy of which is attached hereto. 21 8. 22 without Court approval. Each party shall be represented in person at the Case Management 23 Conference by lead trial counsel (or a party if in pro se), who shall be (1) prepared to address all of 24 the matters referred to in the Northern District of California’s general standing order on Joint Case 25 Management Statements; and (2) have full authority to enter stipulations and make admissions 26 pursuant to that order. Permission for a party to attend by telephone may be granted, in the Court's 27 discretion, upon written request made at least two weeks in advance of the hearing if the Court 28 determines that good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not No later than seven (7) days before the initial case management or status conference, the Parties may not stipulate to continue a case management, status, or pretrial conference 3 1 needed in order to have an effective conference. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth 2 in the request. 3 9. 4 reported by a court reporter unless counsel requests a court reporter in advance. All case management, status and pretrial conferences are audio recorded. They are not 5 CIVIL DISCOVERY 6 Discovery Disputes 7 10. 8 manner, the Court uses the following procedure. The parties shall not file formal discovery motions. 9 Instead, as required by the federal and local rules, the parties shall first meet and confer to try to In order to respond to discovery disputes in a flexible, cost-effective and efficient resolve their disagreements. The meet and confer session must be in person or by telephone, and 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 may not be conducted by letter, e-mail, or fax. If disagreements remain, the parties shall file a joint 12 letter no later than five (5) business days after the meet and confer session. Lead trial counsel for 13 both parties must sign the letter, which shall include an attestation that the parties met and 14 conferred in person or by telephone regarding all issues prior to filing the letter. Going issue-by- 15 issue, the joint letter shall describe each unresolved issue, summarize each party’s position with 16 appropriate legal authority; and provide each party’s final proposed compromise before moving to 17 the next issue. The joint letter shall not exceed ten (10) pages without leave of Court. In the rare 18 instance that a joint letter is not possible, each side may submit a letter not to exceed four (4) pages, 19 which shall include an explanation of why a joint letter was not possible. When appropriate, the 20 parties may submit one exhibit to the letter that sets forth each discovery request at issue in full, 21 followed immediately by the objections and/or responses thereto. No other information shall be 22 included in any such exhibit. No other exhibits shall be submitted without prior approval by the 23 Court. The Court will review the submission(s) and determine whether formal briefing or 24 proceedings are necessary. 25 11. 26 exhausting good faith attempts to resolve disputed issues, seek judicial intervention pursuant to Civil 27 L.R. 37-1(b) by contacting the Court through the courtroom deputy. If the Court is unavailable, the 28 discovery event shall proceed with objections noted for the record. In emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), any party may, after 4 1 12. 2 and beneficial for the parties if counsel appear in person. This provides the opportunity, where 3 appropriate, to engage counsel in resolving aspects of the discovery dispute while remaining 4 available to rule on any disputes that counsel are not able to resolve. For this reason, the Court 5 expects counsel to appear in person. Permission for a party to attend by telephone may be granted, 6 in the Court's discretion, upon written request made at least two weeks in advance of the hearing if 7 the Court determines that good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal 8 attendance is not needed in order to have an effective discovery hearing. The facts establishing good 9 cause must be set forth in the request. In the event that a discovery hearing is ordered, the Court has found that it is often efficient Privilege Logs 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 13. 12 it is privileged or otherwise protected from discovery, that party shall promptly prepare and provide 13 a privilege log that is sufficiently detailed and informative for the opposing party to assess whether a 14 document’s designation as privileged is justified. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5). The privilege log shall 15 set forth the privilege relied upon and specify separately for each document or for each category of 16 similarly situated documents: If a party withholds information that is responsive to a discovery request by claiming that 17 (a) the title and description of the document, including number of pages or Bates-number 18 range; 19 (b) the subject matter addressed in the document; 20 (c) the identity and position of its author(s); 21 (d) the identity and position of all addressees and recipients; 22 (e) the date the document was prepared and, if different, the date(s) on which it was sent to or 23 shared with persons other than its author(s); and 24 (f) the specific basis for the claim that the document is privileged or protected. 25 Failure to furnish this information promptly may be deemed a waiver of the privilege or protection. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 ______________________________ DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 5 1 2 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL JUDGES OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 3 Commencing March 1, 2007, all judges of the Northern District of California will require the 4 identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5 16-9. The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in 6 unusually complex cases, should not exceed ten pages: 7 1. 8 plaintiff’s claims and defendant’s counterclaims, whether any issues exist regarding personal 9 jurisdiction or venue, whether any parties remain to be served, and, if any parties remain to be Jurisdiction and Service: The basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction over served, a proposed deadline for service. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 2. 12 issues in dispute. 13 3. 14 of law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions. 15 4. Motions: All prior and pending motions, their current status, and any anticipated motions. 16 5. Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses are expected to 17 be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the pleadings. 18 6. 19 evident in this action, including interdiction of any document-destruction program and any 20 ongoing erasures of e-mails, voice mails, and other electronically-recorded material. 21 7. 22 requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and a description of the disclosures made. 23 8. 24 proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, and a proposed discovery plan 25 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). 26 9. Class Actions: If a class action, a proposal for how and when the class will be certified. 27 10. Related Cases: Any related cases or proceedings pending before another judge of this 28 court, or before another court or administrative body. Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed points Evidence Preservation: Steps taken to preserve evidence relevant to the issues reasonably Disclosures: Whether there has been full and timely compliance with the initial disclosure Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated discovery, any 6 1 11. 2 damages sought and a description of the bases on which damages are calculated. In addition, any 3 party from whom damages are sought must describe the bases on which it contends damages 4 should be calculated if liability is established. 5 12. 6 plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. 3-5 and a description of key discovery or 7 motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a resolution. 8 13. 9 magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. Relief: All relief sought through complaint or counterclaim, including the amount of any Settlement and ADR: Prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and a specific ADR Consent to Magistrate Judge For All Purposes: Whether all parties will consent to have a 14. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. 12 15. 13 to expedite the presentation of evidence at trial (e.g., through summaries or stipulated facts), and 14 any request to bifurcate issues, claims, or defenses. 15 16. 16 basis with streamlined procedures. 17 17. 18 dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial. 19 18. 20 the trial. 21 19. 22 “Certification of Interested Entities or Persons” required by Civil Local Rule 3-16. In addition, 23 each party must restate in the case management statement the contents of its certification by 24 identifying any persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other 25 entities known by the party to have either: (i) a financial interest in the subject matter in 26 controversy or in a party to the proceeding; or (ii) any other kind of interest that could be 27 substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. 28 20. Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding arbitration, a Narrowing of Issues: Issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by motion, suggestions Expedited Schedule: Whether this is the type of case that can be handled on an expedited Scheduling: Proposed dates for designation of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of Trial: Whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court and the expected length of Disclosure of Non-party Interested Entities or Persons: Whether each party has filed the Such other matters as may facilitate the just, speedy and inexpensive disposition of this matter. 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?