Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
ORDER REOPENING CASE, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Settlement Case Management Conference set for 5/22/2013 02:30 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/12/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6 HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE
Case No: C 12-2460 SBA
COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation,
ORDER REOPENING ACTION;
ORDER OF REFERENCE FOR
Dkt. 29, 30
BANK OF AMERICA, et al.,
Good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The parties’ joint motion to reopen is GRANTED. The Clerk shall reopen the
file and restore the matter to the Court’s active civil docket.
This matter is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu for a mandatory
settlement conference to take place within ninety (90) days of the date this Order is filed.
All proceedings in this action, except any efforts to settle the action, shall be
held in ABEYANCE pending the completion of the mandatory settlement conference.
In the event the action does not settle, the parties shall appear for a
TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE on May 22, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.
Prior to the date scheduled for the conference, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare
a joint Case Management Conference Statement which complies with the Standing Order
for All Judges of the Northern District of California and the Standing Orders of this Court.
Plaintiff shall assume responsibility for filing the joint statement no less than seven (7) days
prior to the conference date. Plaintiff’s counsel is to set up the conference call with all the
parties on the line and call chambers at (510) 637-3559. NO PARTY SHALL CONTACT
CHAMBERS DIRECTLY WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION OF THE COURT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
This order terminates Docket 29 and 30.
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?