Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 115

ORDER by Judge Claudia WilkenDENYING DEFENDANTS 112 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 5 6 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docket No. 112) Plaintiff, v. 7 AT&T CORP., et al., 8 Defendants. ________________________________/ 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California No. C 12-2494 CW On December 12, 2013, Defendants AT&T Corp. and SBC Internet 11 Services, Inc. filed a motion for relief from Magistrate Judge 12 Spero’s December 6, 2013 discovery order. 13 order directs them to meet and confer with Plaintiff Brandywine 14 Communications Technologies, LLC, and to agree on a protocol for 15 providing Plaintiff’s expert with secure access to certain 16 confidential materials. 17 explained why they cannot provide Plaintiff’s expert with secure 18 access to their confidential materials, their motion (Docket No. 19 112) is DENIED. 20 Docket No. 112. The Because Defendants have not persuasively The parties shall agree on a protocol by which Plaintiff’s 21 expert can securely access the relevant confidential materials, as 22 originally directed by Magistrate Judge Spero’s order, by December 23 23, 2013. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: 12/20/2013 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?