Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
Filing
115
ORDER by Judge Claudia WilkenDENYING DEFENDANTS 112 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
5
6
ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR RELIEF FROM
NONDISPOSITIVE
ORDER OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(Docket No. 112)
Plaintiff,
v.
7
AT&T CORP., et al.,
8
Defendants.
________________________________/
9
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 12-2494 CW
On December 12, 2013, Defendants AT&T Corp. and SBC Internet
11
Services, Inc. filed a motion for relief from Magistrate Judge
12
Spero’s December 6, 2013 discovery order.
13
order directs them to meet and confer with Plaintiff Brandywine
14
Communications Technologies, LLC, and to agree on a protocol for
15
providing Plaintiff’s expert with secure access to certain
16
confidential materials.
17
explained why they cannot provide Plaintiff’s expert with secure
18
access to their confidential materials, their motion (Docket No.
19
112) is DENIED.
20
Docket No. 112.
The
Because Defendants have not persuasively
The parties shall agree on a protocol by which Plaintiff’s
21
expert can securely access the relevant confidential materials, as
22
originally directed by Magistrate Judge Spero’s order, by December
23
23, 2013.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated:
12/20/2013
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?