Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 64

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 63 Stipulation of Dismissal of Claims Under U.S. Patent No. 5,444,704. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Brian H. VanderZanden (Pro Hac Vice)
FARNEY DANIELS LLP
800 S. Austin Ave., Suite 200
Georgetown, TX
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
William H. Boice (pro hac vice applic. pending)
Russell A. Korn (Pro hac vice)
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800
Atlanta, GE 30309-4528
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Emails:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Daniel S. Young (pro hac vice)
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1400 Wewatta Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Robert J. Artuz (Cal. Bar No. 227789)
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Emails:
[e-mail]
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
AT&T CORP., AND SBC INTERNET SERVICES, INC.

20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

21
22
23

BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff,
v.

Case Number: C 12-02494 CW
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
OF CLAIMS UNDER U.S. PATENT
NO. 5,444,704 AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

AT&T CORP. and SBC INTERNET
SERVICES, INC.
Defendants.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS UNDER U.S. PATENT NO. 5,444,704
Case No. C 12-02494 CW

1

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) , Plaintiff, Brandywine Communications

2

Technologies, LLC (“Brandywine”) and Defendants AT&T Corp. and SBC Internet Services, Inc.

3

(“Defendants”), hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims asserted by

4

Brandywine against Defendants with respect to U.S. Patent 5,444,704 (“the ’704 patent”) and

5

further stipulate to the dismissal without prejudice of Defendants’ counterclaims alleging

6

invalidity of U.S. Patent 5,444,704.

7

Defendants further agree that, for their affiliates and successors, they will only resurrect

8

their claims of invalidity against the ’704 patent if they are later sued for infringement of the ’704

9

patent or are required to indemnify a third party for a claim of infringement of the ’704 patent.

10

Brandywine further agrees to release, for its affiliates and successors, all of Defendants’ affiliates,

11

employees, agents, customers, and suppliers from all claims of infringement of the ’704 patent.

12

This dismissal shall have no effect on the Parties’ assertion of claims and counterclaims

13

with respect to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,828,657; 7,894,472; 6,970,501; 5,206,854; 5,251,328 and

14

5,812,537.

15
16

Dated: February 12, 2013

17
18

Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Brian H. VanderZanden
Brian H. VanderZanden (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
FARNEY DANIELS LLP
Attorney for Plaintiff
BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES LLC

19
20
21
Dated: February 12, 2013

Respectfully submitted,

22
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
23
24
25
26
27
28

By: /s/ Robert J. Artuz
William H. Boice (pro hac vice applic. pending)
Russell A. Korn (pro hac vice)
Daniel S. Young (pro hac vice)
Robert J. Artuz
Attorneys for Defendants
AT&T CORP. and SBC INTERNET SERVICES, INC.
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS UNDER U.S. PATENT NO. 5,444,704
Case No. C 12-02494 CW

2

1
2
3
4

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Robert Artuz, hereby attests that the above-named
signatories concur in this filing.
DATED: February 12, 2013
/s/ Robert J. Artuz
Robert J. Artuz

5
6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

2/13/2013
DATED: _____________________

________________________________
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS UNDER U.S. PATENT NO. 5,444,704
Case No. C 12-02494 CW

3