Williams v. County of Alameda, The et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purposes. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/13/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)

Case4:12-cv-02511-SBA Document38 Filed05/07/13 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4

DARRYL PARKER, CASB NO. 95914
PREMIER LAW GROUP
3380 146th Place SE, Suite 430
Bellevue, WA 98007
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff Williams

5

10

DONNA R. ZIEGLER [142415]
County Counsel
By: ROBERT D. REITER [124926]
Deputy County Counsel
SAMANTHA N. STONEWORK-HAND [245788]
Associate County Counsel
Office of County Counsel, County of Alameda
1221 Oak Street, Suite 450
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone:
[phone]

11

Attorneys for Defendants

6
7
8
9

12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

CURTIS D. WILLIAMS, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, KEVIN H.
ESTEP, THOMAS F. MADIGAN, MARIO M.
FELIX, BRIAN R. FERNANDEZ, MICHAEL
J. GIAMMALVO, MICAH BENNETT, LUIS
SANTAMARIA, , and DOES 1-5 inclusive,

Case No.: C12-02511 (SBA)

XXXXXXXXX
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDERTO REFER DISCOVERY
DISPUTE TO A MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REFER DISCOVERY DISPUTE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case No. C 12-02511
1

Case4:12-cv-02511-SBA Document38 Filed05/07/13 Page2 of 3

STIPULATION

1
2

COMES NOW the parties, by and through their attorneys of record, who hereby stipulate

3

and agree to have the current discovery dispute referred to a magistrate judge for an in camera

4

review of personnel files and citizens’ complaints of the individual defendants named in the First

5

Amended Complaint. After review and briefing, the parties also stipulate and agree to have said

6

magistrate judge determine which, if any, of the above documents are to be delivered to

7

plaintiff's counsel and under what circumstances.

8
9
10

DATED: April 30, 2013
Premier Law Group PLLC

Office of the County Counsel in and for the
County of Alameda, State of California

11
12
13

By: /s/ Darryl Parker
Darryl Parker
Attorney for Plaintiff

_

By: /s/ Robert D. Reiter
Robert D. Reiter
Attorney for Defendants

_

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REFER DISCOVERY DISPUTE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case No. C 12-02511
2

Case4:12-cv-02511-SBA Document38 Filed05/07/13 Page3 of 3

XXXXXXXXXX ORDER
[PROPOSED]

1
2

THIS MATTER having come before the court upon the foregoing stipulation of the

3

parties and the court otherwise finding good cause, now, therefore,

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court will refer the above described discovery dispute to a

5

Magistrate Judge .

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

5/13
Dated: __________________, 2013 _________________________________
__
HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REFER DISCOVERY DISPUTE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case No. C 12-02511
3