Williams v. County of Alameda, The et al

Filing 53

Discovery Order re: in camera review. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/29/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 Northern District of California 6 7 CURTIS D. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 8 v. No. C 12-2511 SBA (MEJ) DISCOVERY ORDER RE: IN CAMERA REVIEW 9 THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., 10 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 On August 29, 2013, the Court held a discovery conference in this case regarding Defendants’ 14 production of certain documents for in camera review. Ada Wong appeared for Plaintiff and Robert 15 Reiter appeared for Defendants. At the conference, Defendants agreed to produce redacted 16 documents to Plaintiff within seven days after the Court issues its production order. However, if 17 Defendants object to the Court’s production order, they shall instead file a notice of objection(s) 18 within seven days. 19 Although not addressed during the conference, the Court requests that Defendants submit the 20 documents with Bates numbers or another numbering method for ease of reference. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: August 29, 2013 24 25 26 27 28 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?