Williams v. County of Alameda, The et al

Filing 53

Discovery Order re: in camera review. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/29/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

Northern District of California

6
7

CURTIS D. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,

8
v.

No. C 12-2511 SBA (MEJ)
DISCOVERY ORDER RE: IN
CAMERA REVIEW

9
THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.,
10
Defendants.
_____________________________________/

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

13

On August 29, 2013, the Court held a discovery conference in this case regarding Defendants’

14 production of certain documents for in camera review. Ada Wong appeared for Plaintiff and Robert
15 Reiter appeared for Defendants. At the conference, Defendants agreed to produce redacted
16 documents to Plaintiff within seven days after the Court issues its production order. However, if
17 Defendants object to the Court’s production order, they shall instead file a notice of objection(s)
18 within seven days.
19

Although not addressed during the conference, the Court requests that Defendants submit the

20 documents with Bates numbers or another numbering method for ease of reference.
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23 Dated: August 29, 2013
24
25
26
27
28

_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge