J.K. v. San Rafael City Schools

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/24/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013)

1
2
3
4

Margaret M. Broussard (SB Number 219251)
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICE OF MARGARET M. BROUSSARD
648 Lavastone Drive
Lincoln, CA 95648
Telephone:
916-223-2615
Facsimile:
916-880-5252

5
6

Attorney for Plaintiff
J.K, a minor student by and through his Guardian Ad Litem M.K.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

)
)
J.K., a minor student by and through
)
His Guardian Ad Litem M.K.
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
SAN RAFAEL CITY SCHOOLS
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)

Case No. C-12-2563
STIPULATION
TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE
AND ORDER

19
20

Plaintiff J.K. and Defendant SAN RAFAEL CITY SCHOOLS hereby stipulate through their

21

respective counsel, to dismiss this matter WITH PREJUDICE. The parties entered into a settlement

22

agreement at the settlement conference on January 22, 2013.

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE C-12-2563

Page 1 of 2

1

DATED: January 23, 2013

LAW OFFICE OF MARGARET BROUSSARD

2
3

By: /s/ Margaret M. Broussard

4

Attorney for Plaintiff J.K.

5
6
7

DATED: January 23, 2013

FAGEN FRIEDMAN AND FULFROST

8
9

By: /s/ Douglas Freifeld

10

Attorney for Defendant

11

San Rafael City Schools

12
13
14
15

I attest that I have obtained Mr. Freifeld’s concurrence in the filing of this document.
DATED: January 23, 2013

/s/ Margaret Broussard

16
17
18

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

January 24
DATED: ____________________, 2013

21

UNIT
ED

R NIA

amilton

LI

ER

FO

yllis J. H

Judge Ph

A

H

26

Honorable Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
RT

25

ED

ORDER

IT IS SO

NO

24

RT
U
O

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

_______________________________
S

22

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
DISTRICT OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE C-12-2563

Page 2 of 2