Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Hong et al

Filing 100

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING ((33 and 38 in case 4:13-cv-00777-CW); (29 in case 4:13-cv-01029-CW); and (30 in case 4:13-cv-01769-CW )) CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; VACATING TRIAL DATES.(denying (99 in case 4:12-cv-02658-CW); (50 in case 4:13-cv-00777-CW); (38 on case 4:13-cv-01769-CW); (39 in case 4:13-cv-1769-CW) Stipulation) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2014)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP.,
Plaintiff,

Defendants.
________________________________/

ORDER DENYING
CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE;
VACATING TRIAL
DATES

SEONG HOON HONG, et al.,

No. C 13-0777

5
6
7
8

No. C 12-2658

v.
SEONG HOON HONG, et al.,

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

Plaintiffs,
v.

13

CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.,

14

Defendant.
________________________________/

15
16

YOUNG HO WON,

17
18

No. C 13-1029

Plaintiff,
v.

19

CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.,

20

Defendant.
________________________________/

21
22

SEONG HOON HONG,

23
24

Plaintiff,
v.

25

CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.,

26

Defendant.
________________________________/

27
28

No. C 13-1769

1

On January 14, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation again to
continue the dispositive motions hearing and case management

3

conference in these related cases from January 23, 2014 to

4

February 27, 2014.

5

13-0777; Docket No. 39 in Case No. 13-1769; Docket No. 38 in Case

6

No. 13-1029; Docket No. 99 in Case No. 12-2658) is DENIED.

7

Instead of continuing the hearing date, the Court DENIES without

8

prejudice the pending cross-motions for summary judgment (Docket

9

Nos. 33 & 38 in Case No. 13-0777; Docket No. 30 in Case No. 13-

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

2

1769; Docket No. 29 in Case No. 13-1029) and continues the case

11

management conference to Wednesday, February 26, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

12

The parties may re-notice their summary judgment motions for a

13

later date if they are ultimately unable to finalize their

14

settlement agreement.

This stipulation (Docket No. 50 in Case No.

15

If the summary judgment motions hearing were continued until

16

February 27 as the parties requested, or thereafter, the April 7,

17

2014 trial date would no longer be viable.

18

previously set trial and pretrial conference dates are hereby

19

VACATED.

20

finalize their settlement agreement.

21

Accordingly, the

These dates will be reset if the parties fail to

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24

Dated:

1/15/2014

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28
2