Santana-Watts v. Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. et al
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 11/5/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 11/1/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2012)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DEBORAH SANTANA-WATTS,
8
9
Plaintiff(s),
MITSUI & CO. (U.S.A.) ET.AL.,
11
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
12
13
Plaintiff Deborah Santana-Watts filed this action on May 25, 2012. [Docket No. 1.] On
14
August 31, 2012, she moved the court to continue the case management conference because she was
15
“still in the process of locating the true [Defendant] and locating the appropriate agent for service of
16
process.” [Docket No. 7.] The court granted the motion and continued the September 5, 2012 case
17
management conference to November 7, 2012. [Docket No. 9.] Accordingly, Plaintiff’s case
18
management statement was due October 31, 2012. [Docket No. 9.]
19
Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff had until September
20
22, 2012 to serve the defendant. Plaintiff has failed to do so. Plaintiff also did not file her case
21
management statement. The court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE by November 5,
22
2012 as to why the court should not dismiss her case for failure to prosecute.
NO
RT
28
DONNA M. RYU na M. Ryu
on
United StateseMagistrate Judge
Judg D
H
ER
R NIA
27
Dated: November 1, 2012
LI
26
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
A
25
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
23
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
10
United States District Court
No. C 12-02701 DMR
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?