Santana-Watts v. Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 11/5/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 11/1/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DEBORAH SANTANA-WATTS, 8 9 Plaintiff(s), MITSUI & CO. (U.S.A.) ET.AL., 11 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 12 13 Plaintiff Deborah Santana-Watts filed this action on May 25, 2012. [Docket No. 1.] On 14 August 31, 2012, she moved the court to continue the case management conference because she was 15 “still in the process of locating the true [Defendant] and locating the appropriate agent for service of 16 process.” [Docket No. 7.] The court granted the motion and continued the September 5, 2012 case 17 management conference to November 7, 2012. [Docket No. 9.] Accordingly, Plaintiff’s case 18 management statement was due October 31, 2012. [Docket No. 9.] 19 Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff had until September 20 22, 2012 to serve the defendant. Plaintiff has failed to do so. Plaintiff also did not file her case 21 management statement. The court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE by November 5, 22 2012 as to why the court should not dismiss her case for failure to prosecute. NO RT 28 DONNA M. RYU na M. Ryu on United StateseMagistrate Judge Judg D H ER R NIA 27 Dated: November 1, 2012 LI 26 D RDERE OO IT IS S A 25 S IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 24 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 23 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 10 United States District Court No. C 12-02701 DMR N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?