Santana-Watts v. Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. et al

Filing 75

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall cert ify to this court, within 30 days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. All further dates are vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 01/22/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DEBORAH SANTANA-WATTS, 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff(s), No. C-12-02701 DMR ADMIRAL LINE (UK) LIMITED ET.AL., 12 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 13 14 The court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, 15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; 16 provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within 30 days, with proof of 17 service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has 18 not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be 19 restored to the calendar to be set for trial. All further dates are vacated. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: January 22, 2014 23 24 25 26 27 28 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?