Cruz v. Sky Chefs, Inc. et al

Filing 48

ORDER SEEKING CLARIFICATION. The parties are directed to file a joint statement by May 7, 2013 addressing (1) whether Plaintiff intends LSG to be a defendant, and (2) if so, whether LSG was served with the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/03/13. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 CESAR CRUZ, 12 13 Plaintiff(s), No. C-12-02705 DMR ORDER SEEKING CLARIFICATION RE DEFENDANT LSG SKY CHEFS v. 14 SKY CHEFS, INC. ET.AL., 15 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 On September 19, 2012, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this court dismissed Defendant LSG Lufthansa Service holding AG dba LSG Sky Chefs (“LSG”) without prejudice. [Docket No. 19.] On December 21, 2012, the court issued an order directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by January 25, 2013, conforming to the stipulations made during a hearing on December 20, 2012. [Docket No. 30.] On January 16, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint again naming LSG as a defendant. [Docket No. 32.] LSG’s status in this case is unclear. LSG has not made an appearance in this case, nor has it responded to the Second Amended Complaint. The parties are directed to file a joint statement by May 7, 2013 addressing (1) whether Plaintiff intends LSG to be a defendant, and (2) if so, whether LSG was served with the Second Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 3, 2013 25 26 27 28 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?