Sprint Nextel Corporation v. Ngo
Filing
28
ORDER REGARDING DEFAULT AND VACATING JULY 19, 2012 HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on July 5, 2012. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, a
Kansas Corporation,
Plaintiff,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v.
THUC NGO d/b/a TONY BUY iPHONE,
an individual,
No. C 12-2764 CW
ORDER REGARDING
DEFAULT AND
VACATING JULY 19,
2012 HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR A PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
Defendant.
________________________________/
Default having been entered by the Clerk on July 5, 2012,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Sprint Nextel Corporation
shall file a motion for default judgment within 30 days from the
date of this order, and upon filing of motion for default
judgment, said motion will be referred to Magistrate Judge
Laporte, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, to be heard and
considered at the convenience of her calendar.
In addition,
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, Docket No. 17, is
referred to Magistrate Judge Laporte for consideration in
connection with the motion for default judgment.
The July 19,
2012 hearing on the motion before the undersigned is vacated.
Magistrate Judge shall prepare findings and recommendations on
both motions.
The
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Case Management Conference
2
previously set for August 1, 2012 is continued to October 24,
3
2012.
4
5
6
7
Dated:
July 5, 2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
cc: MagRef
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?