BP Assets Group, LLC et al v. Nadonza
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, ORDER REMANDING CASE to Clerk of Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/16/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
BP ASSETS GROUP, LLC and TSENG
INVESTMENT, LLC,
6
Plaintiffs,
Case No.: 12-CV-03106-YGR
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
RECOMMENDATION TO REMAND CASE
7
8
9
vs.
EVANGELINA NADONZA and WILFREDO
NADONZA,
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
Defendants.
12
13
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Cousins’s Referral for Reassignment With
14
Recommendation to Remand Case (“Recommendation”). (Dkt. No. 4.) Upon reassignment to this
15
Court, an Order was issued stating that: “Matters for which a magistrate judge has already issued a
16
report and recommendation shall not be rebriefed or noticed for hearing before the newly assigned
17
judge; such matters shall proceed in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).” (Dkt. No. 5.) Pursuant
18
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and the Recommendation, the parties had fourteen days from the filing date of
19
the Recommendation to object. That deadline has passed and no objection was filed. The Court finds
20
the Recommendation to be correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect.
21
Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Recommendation, this case is remanded to the
22
Superior Court of State of California, County of San Mateo. The Clerk of this Court is further
23
ordered to forward certified copies of this Order and all docket entries to the Clerk of the Superior
24
Court of California, County of San Mateo.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: July 16, 2012
27
28
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?