Grimes v. Barber et al

Filing 42

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING 40 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JEROME L. GRIMES, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 No. C 12-3111 CW Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE (Docket No. 40) v. OFFICER BARBER; OFFICER SMITH; OFFICER TANG; and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendants. ________________________________/ On March 20, 2013, the Court extended the deadline for 16 Plaintiff Jerome L. Grimes to serve Defendants Officers Barber, 17 Smith and Tang until May 28, 2013. Docket No. 36. On May 23, 18 2013, the Court again extended the deadline for Plaintiff to serve 19 these Defendants until July 29, 2013. Docket No. 38. 20 Plaintiff now moves for an additional sixty days in which to 21 serve these Defendants. Plaintiff explains that he is now being 22 held at the San Francisco County Jail. Mot. at 1. 23 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion and extends 24 time for service upon Officers Barber, Smith and Tang until 25 September 27, 2013. 26 By that date, Plaintiff must file either proof of service 27 upon each of these Defendants or a motion for additional time in 28 1 which to serve them, in which he provides good cause for the 2 failure to serve them within the allowed time period. 3 failure to comply with the terms of this Order will result in 4 dismissal of his claims for failure to prosecute. 5 Plaintiff’s IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 Dated: 7/23/2013 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?