Grimes v. Barber et al
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING 40 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JEROME L. GRIMES,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
No. C 12-3111 CW
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR SERVICE
(Docket No. 40)
v.
OFFICER BARBER; OFFICER SMITH;
OFFICER TANG; and BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE
UNIVERSITY,
Defendants.
________________________________/
On March 20, 2013, the Court extended the deadline for
16
Plaintiff Jerome L. Grimes to serve Defendants Officers Barber,
17
Smith and Tang until May 28, 2013.
Docket No. 36.
On May 23,
18
2013, the Court again extended the deadline for Plaintiff to serve
19
these Defendants until July 29, 2013.
Docket No. 38.
20
Plaintiff now moves for an additional sixty days in which to
21
serve these Defendants.
Plaintiff explains that he is now being
22
held at the San Francisco County Jail.
Mot. at 1.
23
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion and extends
24
time for service upon Officers Barber, Smith and Tang until
25
September 27, 2013.
26
By that date, Plaintiff must file either proof of service
27
upon each of these Defendants or a motion for additional time in
28
1
which to serve them, in which he provides good cause for the
2
failure to serve them within the allowed time period.
3
failure to comply with the terms of this Order will result in
4
dismissal of his claims for failure to prosecute.
5
Plaintiff’s
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: 7/23/2013
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?