Intellisoft Ltd v. Toshiba Corporation et al
Filing
39
ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER staying case. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
INTELLISOFT LTD,.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
v.
13
ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS;
ORDER STAYING CASE
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, et al.,
14
No. C 12-3128 PJH
Defendants.
_______________________________/
15
16
The motion of defendant Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. (“TAIS”) for an
17
order dismissing the claims asserted against it in the first amended complaint (“FAC”) came
18
on for hearing before this court on September 12, 2012. Plaintiff Intellisoft Ltd. appeared
19
by its counsel J. Paul Gignac, and TAIS appeared by its counsel Irfan Lateef and Timothy
20
Goodson. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments, and
21
good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows and for the reasons stated at the
22
hearing.
23
The motion to dismiss the FAC for lack of standing is DENIED, as the court finds
24
that that issue must be decided based on a factual record. The motion to dismiss the FAC
25
based on the running of the statute of limitations is GRANTED with leave to amend to
26
allege facts showing that the running of the statute was tolled based on application of the
27
discovery rule. Because a similar issue is currently under appeal in the case of Bierman v.
28
IBM, C-10-4199 PJH, the court finds that the present case should be STAYED pending a
1
ruling by the Ninth Circuit. The second amended complaint will be due 30 days after the
2
stay is lifted.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: September 13, 2012
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?