Jordan v. District Court Judge
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/14/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2013)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE,
)
)
Defendant.
_____________________________ )
IMHOTEP JORDAN, JR.,
No. C 12-3159 SBA (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff Imhotep Jordan, Jr., an inmate at California State Prison in Lancaster, filed
15
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 on June 19, 2012. On the same date, the
16
Clerk of the Court sent Plaintiff a notice instructing him to complete an in forma pauperis
17
application within thirty days from the filing date stamped on the notice, or else his case
18
would be dismissed.
19
20
21
On July 10, 2012, the Court's mail was returned as undeliverable because Plaintiff
refused to accept it.
On July 25, 2012, Plaintiff filed a document entitled, "Presentation of Judicial Notice
22
of Mail Tampering by Prison Employee," in which he stated he did not accept the Court's
23
mail because it had been opened by a prison employee.
24
On August 27, 2012, the Clerk of the Court sent Plaintiff a second notice that the
25
completion of his in forma pauperis application was due in thirty days from the filing date of
26
the notice, and that the failure to comply would result in the dismissal of his case.
27
28
On December 5, 2012, the Court's mail was returned as undeliverable because, again,
Plaintiff refused to accept it.
1
More than thirty days have passed since the Clerk of the Court sent Plaintiff a second
2
notice that his in forma pauperis application was due. Plaintiff has not submitted the
3
requisite application as ordered or communicated with the Court since July 25, 2012. The
4
Court therefore finds that Plaintiff's refusal to accept mail from the Court, lack of
5
communication, and non-compliance with the Court's instructions constitute grounds for
6
dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d
7
1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly,
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the instant action is DISMISSED without
prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 2-14-13
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
IMHOTEP JORDAN JR,
4
Case Number: CV12-03159 SBA
Plaintiff,
5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
6
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE et al,
7
Defendant.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on February 19, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
13
14
15
16
17
Imhotep Jordan C-71742
California State Prison - Los Angeles at Lancaster
(LAC)
P.O. Box 8457
44751 60th Street West
Lancaster, CA
18
Dated: February 19, 2013
19
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Lisa Clark, Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.12\Jordan 12-3159 Dis.frm
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?