Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.

Filing 108

ORDER GRANTING 106 STIPULATION STAYING ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/29/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2014)

Case4:12-cv-03231-JSW Document106 Filed04/28/14 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Stefani E. Shanberg (State Bar No. 206717)
[e-mail]
Jennifer J. Schmidt (State Bar No. 295579)
[e-mail]
Madeleine E. Greene (State Bar No. 263120)
[e-mail]
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
One Market Plaza
Spear Tower, Suite 3300
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Ryan R. Smith (State Bar No. 229323)
[e-mail]
Robert R. Cleary, Jr. (State Bar No. 282113)
[e-mail]
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Delaware corporation,

20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 3:12-cv-03231-JSW

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING
ARBITRATION

SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
a California corporation,
Defendant.

25
26

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. (“Check Point”) and

27

Defendant-Counterclaimant SRI International, Inc. (“SRI”) hereby make a stipulated request that

28

the case, including all deadlines, shall be stayed until further notice of the Court;
JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED]
ORDER STAYING ACTION
Case No. 3:12-cv-03231-JSW

-1-

Case4:12-cv-03231-JSW Document106 Filed04/28/14 Page2 of 3

1
2

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to participate in a binding arbitration before the
Honorable James Ware (Ret.) in order to fully resolve this litigation.

3

It is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to approval of the Court, that this

4

action be stayed in its entirety pending arbitration before the Hon. James Ware. In the event that

5

the execution of the confidential settlement agreement and exchange of consideration between

6

the parties is not carried out, the parties shall promptly notify the Court.

7

Dated: April 28, 2014

8

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation

9
/s/ Stefani E. Shanberg
Stefani E. Shanberg

By:

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

12
13
14

Dated: April 28, 2014

FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.

15
16

/s/ Howard G. Pollack
Howard G. Pollack

By:

17

Attorneys for Defendant
SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC.

18
19

[PROPOSED] ORDER

20
21

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

April 29, 2014
Dated: ______________________

24
25
Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED]
ORDER STAYING ACTION
Case No. 3:12-cv-03231-JSW

-2-