Internet Patents Corporation v. EBAGs, Inc et al

Filing 49

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 48 Stipulation (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Michael P. Adams (admitted pro hac vice) Brian L. King (admitted pro hac vice) WINSTEAD PC 401 Congress Ave., Suite 2100 Austin, TX 78701 (512) 370-2858 / (512) 370-2850 (Fax) madams@winstead.com bking@winstead.com Ian R. Walsworth (admitted vice pending) Todd P. Blakely (admitted vice pending) SHERIDAN ROSS PC 1560 Broadway, Suite 1200 Denver, CO 80202-5141 (303) 863-2976 (303) 863-0223 (Fax) iwalsworth@sheridanross.com tblakely@sheridanross.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Joseph A. Greco (Cal. Bar No. 104476) Justin T. Beck (Cal. Bar No. 53138) Kimberly P. Zapata (Cal. Bar No. 138291) Beck Ross Bismonte Finley LLP 150 Almaden Boulevard, 10th Floor San Jose, California 95113 (408) 938-7900 (408) 938-0790 (Fax) jgreco@beckross.com jbeck@beckross.com kzapata@beckross.com Matthew S. Kenefick (Cal. Bar No. 227298) Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 5th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 984-9677 / (888) 430-5780 (Fax) MKenefick@JMBM.com Attorneys for Defendant eBags, Inc. L. Eric Loewe (Cal. Bar No. 203490) Internet Patents Corporation Texas 18050 Gold Center Dr. Suite 250B Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 (916) 853-1529 (916) 631-0486(Fax) EricLoewe@internetpatentscorporation.net Attorneys for Plaintiff Internet Patents Corp. Thomas Fitzpatrick (Cal. Bar No. 193565) Andy H. Chan (Cal. Bar No. 242660) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 (650) 752-3100 (650) 853-1038 (Fax) TFitzpatrick@goodwinprocter.com achan@goodwinprocter.com Attorneys for Defendant TellApart, Inc. 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 21 22 23 INTERNET PATENTS CORPORATION, Case No. 4:12-CV-03385-SBA 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE v. EBAGS, INC. and TELLAPART, INC. Defendants. 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE CASE NO. 4:12-CV-03385-SBA 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), this Stipulation is entered into by and among Plaintiff 2 3 Internet Patents Corporation, f/k/a Insweb Corporation (“Plaintiff” or “IPC”), and Defendants 4 eBags, Inc. (“eBags”) and TellApart, Inc. (“TellApart”) (IPC, eBags, and TellApart will be 5 collectively referred to as “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel: 6 7 8 WHEREAS, IPC filed this suit for patent infringement against Defendants eBags, Inc. and TellApart, Inc. on June 29, 2012; WHEREAS, the parties originally filed a Joint Case Management Statement with a 9 10 Proposed Case Management Schedule on January 31, 2013 [Dkt. No. 35]; 11 WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference was held on February 7, 2013 and per the 12 instructions of the court a revised Case Management Statement with a Proposed Case 13 Management Schedule was emailed to the Court on February 14, 2013; 14 15 WHEREAS, a difference of opinion arose between the parties regarding the proposed schedule’s deadlines; 16 WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred regarding the schedule on April 22, 2013 and 17 18 in an effort to avoid motions practice and in the spirit of cooperation, the parties agreed to amend 19 the proposed schedule to clear up any ambiguity regarding the remaining deadlines. As a result, 20 the parties agreed to make changes to only two deadlines: (1) the date for service of Defendants' 21 invalidity contentions (from May 23, 2013 to May 14, 2013) and (2) the date the parties would 22 serve lists of proposed terms to be construed (from June 6, 2013 to June 7, 2013). 23 WHEREAS, the Court has not yet signed the order for the Joint Case Management 24 Statement and Proposed Case Management Schedule; and 25 26 27 WHEREAS, the amendment to the Proposed Case Management Schedule is not done for delay, but so that justice may be done. 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE CASE NO. 4:12-CV-03385-SBA 1 2 3 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to approval by the Court, as follows: 1. The Parties shall substitute the Proposed Case Management Schedule with the 4 Amended Proposed Case Management Schedule as Appendix A to the Parties’ Joint Case 5 6 7 Management report submitted to the Court, a copy of which is attached hereto; 2. The Amended Proposed Case Management Schedule will be as follows (with 8 previous dates shown): 9 EVENT PROPOSED DEADLINE Service of IPC’s Infringement Contentions and IPC’s Patent L.R. 3-2 Document Production Service of Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions and Defendants’ Patent L.R. 3-4 Document Productions Parties Serve Lists of Proposed Terms for Construction Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-1 Parties Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and Identification of Extrinsic Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2 Parties File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3 Last Day for Claim Construction Discovery Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-4 Plaintiff Files Opening Brief re Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-5(a) Defendants File Opposition Brief re Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-5(b) Plaintiff Files Reply Brief re Proposed Claim Constructions and Rebuttal Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-5(c) Claim Construction Hearing Pursuant to Patent L.R. 46 and Case Management Conference Regarding Remaining Scheduling and Trial Setting Parties File Joint Case Management Statement for Remainder of Case Parties Serve Initial Expert Reports and Produce Related Documents and Materials Parties Serve Rebuttal Expert Reports and Produce Related Documents and Materials M, 3/8/13 (29 days after CMC) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 T, 5/14 23/13 (67 45 days after 3-2) F, 6/7 6/13 (24 30 days after 3-4) Th, 6/27/13 (20 21 days after 4-1) M, 7/22/13 (69 60 days after 3-4) W, 8/21/13 (30 days after 4-3) Th, 9/5/13 (45 days after 4-3) Th, 9/19/13 (14 days after 4-5(a)) Th, 9/26/13 (7 days after 4-5(b)) Th, 10/24/13 at 10 A.M. Th, 10/17/13 TBD TBD 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE CASE NO. 4:12-CV-03385-SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Expert Depositions Commence Final Date to Complete Fact and Expert Discovery Final Date for Filing Dispositive Motions and Motions to Limit or Exclude Expert Testimony Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment Replies in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment Summary Judgment Hearing (subject to Court’s availability) Final Pretrial Conference (subject to Court’s availability) Trial (subject to Court’s availability) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 8 9 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: May 3, 2013 WINSTEAD PC /s/ Brian L. King Brian L. King 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Internet Patents Corporation 13 14 Dated: May 3, 2013 /s/ Ian Walsworth___ Ian Walsworth 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant eBags, Inc. 17 18 Dated: May 3, 2013 19 Attorneys for Defendant TellApart, Inc. 21 23 24 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP /s/ Thomas Fitzpatrick Thomas Fitzpatrick 20 22 SHERIDAN ROSS PC IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May _7, 2013 HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE CASE NO. 4:12-CV-03385-SBA 1 2 3 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Brian L. King, attest that concurrence in the filing of this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT 4 SCHEDULE has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of 5 6 7 perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 3rd day of May, 2013, in AUSTIN, TEXAS. /s/ Brian L. King Brian L. King 8 9 10 11 12 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the forgoing document will be served via electronic mail to counsel of record in this case. 14 /s/ Brian L. King Brian L. King 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE CASE NO. 4:12-CV-03385-SBA 1 APPENDIX A: AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE 2 3 With the exception of a few agreed upon dates, the Parties believe that the case schedule 4 should be set in accordance with the N.D. Cal. Patent Local Rules and that a Claim Construction 5 Hearing should be set at the Court’s direction. The deadlines following construction will be based 6 on the dates provided at a later Case Management Conference to be held following the Claim 7 Construction Hearing. 8 EVENT PROPOSED DEADLINE Service of IPC’s Infringement Contentions and IPC’s Patent L.R. 3-2 Document Production Service of Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions and Defendants’ Patent L.R. 3-4 Document Productions Parties Serve Lists of Proposed Terms for Construction Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-1 Parties Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and Identification of Extrinsic Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2 Parties File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3 Last Day for Claim Construction Discovery Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-4 Plaintiff Files Opening Brief re Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-5(a) Defendants File Opposition Brief re Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-5(b) Plaintiff Files Reply Brief re Proposed Claim Constructions and Rebuttal Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-5(c) Claim Construction Hearing Pursuant to Patent L.R. 46 and Case Management Conference Regarding Remaining Scheduling and Trial Setting Parties File Joint Scheduling Order for Remainder of Case Parties Serve Initial Expert Reports and Produce Related Documents and Materials Parties Serve Rebuttal Expert Reports and Produce Related Documents and Materials Expert Depositions Commence M, 3/8/13 (29 days after CMC) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 T, 5/14/13 (67 days after 3-2) F, 6/7/13 (24 days after 3-4) Th, 6/27/13 (20 days after 4-1) M, 7/22/13 (69 days after 3-4) W, 8/21/13 (30 days after 4-3) Th, 9/5/13 (45 days after 4-3) Th, 9/19/13 (14 days after 4-5(a)) Th, 9/26/13 (7 days after 4-5(b)) Th, 10/24/13 at 10 A.M. Th, 10/31/13 TBD TBD TBD 6 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE CASE NO. 4:12-CV-03385-SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 Final Date to Complete Fact and Expert Discovery Final Date for Filing Dispositive Motions and Motions to Limit or Exclude Expert Testimony Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment Replies in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment Summary Judgment Hearing (subject to Court’s availability) Final Pretrial Conference (subject to Court’s availability) Trial (subject to Court’s availability) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE CASE NO. 4:12-CV-03385-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?