Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc. et al

Filing 170

ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, Attorney Charles August Kertell terminated. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/11/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 James W. Geriak (State Bar No. 32,871) jgeriak@sheppardmullin.com Andre De La Cruz (State Bar No. 245,175) adelacruz@sheppardmullin.com SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP 650 Town Center Drive Fourth Floor Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone: (714) 424-8232 Facsimile: (714) 428-5974 Charles A. Kertell (State Bar No. 181,214) kertellc@dicksteinshapiro.com DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 2 Park Plaza, Suite 900 Irvine, CA 92614-3519 Telephone: (949) 623-7880 Facsimile: (949) 623-7881 Attorneys for Plaintiff ANGIOSCORE, INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OAKLAND DIVISION ANGIOSCORE, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRIREME MEDICAL, INC., EITAN KONSTANTINO, and QUATTRO VASCULAR PTE LTD., Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. Case No. 4:12-cv-3393-YGR NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CHARLES A. KERTELL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF ANGIOSCORE, INC. AND ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 1 2 3 TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, EACH PARTY IN INTEREST, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: Pursuant to Civil L.R. 11.5, notice is hereby given that Charles A. Kertell is withdrawing 4 as counsel of record for plaintiff AngioScore, Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 5 continues to represent AngioScore, Inc. in this matter. 6 7 Dated: February 10, 2014 8 Respectfully submitted, DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 9 10 By: 11 12 /s/ Charles A. Kertell Charles A. Kertell Attorney for Plaintiff ANGIOSCORE, INC. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 16 February 11 Dated: ___________________________, 2014 _________________________________ Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers United States District Court Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?