Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc. et al
Filing
170
ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, Attorney Charles August Kertell terminated. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/11/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
James W. Geriak (State Bar No. 32,871)
jgeriak@sheppardmullin.com
Andre De La Cruz (State Bar No. 245,175)
adelacruz@sheppardmullin.com
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP
650 Town Center Drive
Fourth Floor
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: (714) 424-8232
Facsimile: (714) 428-5974
Charles A. Kertell (State Bar No. 181,214)
kertellc@dicksteinshapiro.com
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
2 Park Plaza, Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92614-3519
Telephone: (949) 623-7880
Facsimile: (949) 623-7881
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ANGIOSCORE, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OAKLAND DIVISION
ANGIOSCORE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
TRIREME MEDICAL, INC., EITAN
KONSTANTINO, and QUATTRO
VASCULAR PTE LTD.,
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
Case No. 4:12-cv-3393-YGR
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF
CHARLES A. KERTELL AS
COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR
PLAINTIFF ANGIOSCORE, INC.
AND ORDER PERMITTING
WITHDRAWAL
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
1
2
3
TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, EACH PARTY IN INTEREST, AND THEIR
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 11.5, notice is hereby given that Charles A. Kertell is withdrawing
4
as counsel of record for plaintiff AngioScore, Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
5
continues to represent AngioScore, Inc. in this matter.
6
7
Dated: February 10, 2014
8
Respectfully submitted,
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
9
10
By:
11
12
/s/ Charles A. Kertell
Charles A. Kertell
Attorney for Plaintiff
ANGIOSCORE, INC.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED:
15
16
February 11
Dated: ___________________________, 2014
_________________________________
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Court Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?