Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc. et al

Filing 193

ORDER DEEMING MOTION WITHDRAWN re #176 Motion for Order filed by Angioscore, Inc. The order requiring supplemental briefing is VACATED. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/15/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12

ANGIOSCORE, INC.,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

Case No.: 12-CV-3393 YGR
ORDER DEEMING MOTION WITHDRAWN

v.
TRIREME MEDICAL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
On February 26, 2014, plaintiff AngioScore, Inc. filed a motion for an order declaring that

18

substitute service purportedly made upon defendants Quattro Vascular PTE Ltd. ("Quattro") and QT

19

Vascular Ltd. ("QTV") was effective and that this Court has personal jurisdiction over those

20

defendants. (Dkt. No. 176 and exhibits.) After briefing completed, the Court ordered further

21

briefing on various questions raised by the parties but not addressed by them to the Court's

22

satisfaction. (Dkt. No. 190.) Thereafter, on April 9, 2014, defendants, including Quattro and QTV,

23

filed a notice of non-opposition to the motion, asserting that counsel for defendants TriReme

24

Medical LLC (fka TriReme Medical, Inc.) and Eitan Konstantino had been authorized to accept

25

service on behalf of Quattro and QTV. (Dkt. No. 191.) On April 11, 2014, plaintiff filed a notice of

26

withdrawal of the motion. (Dkt. No. 192 ("Notice of Withdrawal").)

27
28

Accordingly, the Court deems plaintiff's motion WITHDRAWN. The order requiring
supplemental briefing is VACATED.

1

To the extent that plaintiff's Notice of Withdrawal seeks various explanations, confirmations,

2

and responses from defendants (see Notice of Withdrawal at 1-2), the Court does not interpret

3

plaintiff's notice to seek judicial intervention, as it is a notice, not a motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

4

7(b)(1). Therefore, the Court does not address those matters here. The Court's silence, however,

5

should not be deemed an invitation to further motion practice.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

Dated: April 15, 2014

__________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2