Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc. et al

Filing 232

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Order to Show Cause Hearing set for Friday, 7/11/2014 09:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 5:00pm on Thursday, 7/10/2014. Case Management Conference set for Friday, 7/11/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Responses due by 7/15/2014. Set/Reset Deadlines as to #230 MOTION to Dismiss AngioScore, Inc.'s Third Amended Complaint. Replies due by 7/22/2014. Motion Hearing set for 7/29/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/8/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 ANGIOSCORE, INC., Plaintiff, Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 14 Case No.: 12-CV-3393 YGR ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. TRIREME MEDICAL, INC., et al., Defendants. 15 16 The Court has read and considered the parties' Joint Statement Regarding Additional 17 Discovery. (Dkt. No. 231.) Given the Court's calendar, the Court hereby sets a case management 18 conference on Friday, July 11, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse 19 located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, California. The personal appearances of counsel are required. 20 The Court intends to resolve at the case management conference the outstanding issues identified in 21 the Joint Statement, to the extent not resolved by the parties themselves. 22 To prepare adequately for the conference, the parties shall forthwith provide the Court with 23 copies of any contested written discovery and an outline of the objections thereto. Parties shall not 24 repeat objections where the same objection relates to multiple discovery requests. The parties are 25 advised to be efficient in their arguments. A response will be allowed orally at the conference. A 26 proposed form of order listing each issue shall also be provided. 27 28 The Court encourages the parties to agree mutually on a schedule for depositions prior to Friday. To the extent that the parties cannot agree, the parties are hereby notified that the Court will 1 issue an order mandating a schedule. Failure to comply will result in the appropriate sanction, 2 including monetary and/or evidentiary in nature. 3 Given the limited scope of defendants' Motion to Dismiss AngioScore, Inc.'s Third Amended 4 Complaint (Dkt. No. 230) and its potential impact on discovery, the Court hereby advances briefing. 5 An opposition thereto shall be filed by July 15, 2014, and shall not exceed 15 pages in length. To the 6 extent that any additional facts exist to support plaintiff's claims as discussed therein, they shall be 7 proffered as part of the opposition. Failure to include such a proffer will be deemed as an admission 8 that no additional facts exist at this time. Defendants' reply shall be filed by July 22, 2014 and shall 9 not exceed 10 pages in length. To the extent the Court deems it necessary, oral argument shall occur 10 on July 29, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. Northern District of California United States District Court 11 With respect to the case schedule, the Court will make necessary adjustments on Friday. 12 Finally, the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Case No. 14-2946-LB, TriReme 13 Medical, LLC v. AngioScore, Inc., should not be related to the instant case pursuant to Civil Local 14 Rule 3-12. Each side shall file electronically a separate written response to this Order to Show Cause, 15 not to exceed two pages exclusive of caption and signatures, by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 10, 2014. 16 The Order to Show Cause hearing shall be held concurrently with the July 11 case management 17 conference. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 Dated: July 8, 2014 __________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?