Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc. et al
Filing
232
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Order to Show Cause Hearing set for Friday, 7/11/2014 09:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 5:00pm on Thursday, 7/10/2014. Case Management Conference set for Friday, 7/11/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Responses due by 7/15/2014. Set/Reset Deadlines as to #230 MOTION to Dismiss AngioScore, Inc.'s Third Amended Complaint. Replies due by 7/22/2014. Motion Hearing set for 7/29/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/8/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
ANGIOSCORE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
Case No.: 12-CV-3393 YGR
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
TRIREME MEDICAL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
The Court has read and considered the parties' Joint Statement Regarding Additional
17
Discovery. (Dkt. No. 231.) Given the Court's calendar, the Court hereby sets a case management
18
conference on Friday, July 11, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse
19
located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, California. The personal appearances of counsel are required.
20
The Court intends to resolve at the case management conference the outstanding issues identified in
21
the Joint Statement, to the extent not resolved by the parties themselves.
22
To prepare adequately for the conference, the parties shall forthwith provide the Court with
23
copies of any contested written discovery and an outline of the objections thereto. Parties shall not
24
repeat objections where the same objection relates to multiple discovery requests. The parties are
25
advised to be efficient in their arguments. A response will be allowed orally at the conference. A
26
proposed form of order listing each issue shall also be provided.
27
28
The Court encourages the parties to agree mutually on a schedule for depositions prior to
Friday. To the extent that the parties cannot agree, the parties are hereby notified that the Court will
1
issue an order mandating a schedule. Failure to comply will result in the appropriate sanction,
2
including monetary and/or evidentiary in nature.
3
Given the limited scope of defendants' Motion to Dismiss AngioScore, Inc.'s Third Amended
4
Complaint (Dkt. No. 230) and its potential impact on discovery, the Court hereby advances briefing.
5
An opposition thereto shall be filed by July 15, 2014, and shall not exceed 15 pages in length. To the
6
extent that any additional facts exist to support plaintiff's claims as discussed therein, they shall be
7
proffered as part of the opposition. Failure to include such a proffer will be deemed as an admission
8
that no additional facts exist at this time. Defendants' reply shall be filed by July 22, 2014 and shall
9
not exceed 10 pages in length. To the extent the Court deems it necessary, oral argument shall occur
10
on July 29, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
With respect to the case schedule, the Court will make necessary adjustments on Friday.
12
Finally, the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Case No. 14-2946-LB, TriReme
13
Medical, LLC v. AngioScore, Inc., should not be related to the instant case pursuant to Civil Local
14
Rule 3-12. Each side shall file electronically a separate written response to this Order to Show Cause,
15
not to exceed two pages exclusive of caption and signatures, by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 10, 2014.
16
The Order to Show Cause hearing shall be held concurrently with the July 11 case management
17
conference.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
Dated: July 8, 2014
__________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?