Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc. et al

Filing 243

ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AND CERTAIN EXHIBITS re #219 Order on Discovery Letter Brief, Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, Order on Motion for Leave to File #218 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, Order on Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/11/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
ANGIOSCORE, INC.
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16

TRIREME MEDICAL, LLC (f/k/a TRIREME
MEDICAL, INC.), EITAN KONSTANTINO,
QUATTRO VASCULAR PTE LTD., and QT
VASCULAR LTD. (f/k/a QT VASCULAR PTE.
LTD.),

17
Defendants.
18

21

TRIREME MEDICAL, LLC (f/k/a TRIREME
MEDICAL, INC.), EITAN KONSTANTINO,
QUATTRO VASCULAR PTE. LTD., and QT
VASCULAR LTD. (f/k/a QT VASCULAR PTE.
LTD.),

22

Counterclaimants,

19
20

23
24
25

v.
ANGIOSCORE, INC.
Counterdefendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 4:12-cv-3393-YGR
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING
DOCUMENTS AND CERTAIN
EXHIBITS CITED IN THE
AMENDED DECLARATION OF
SHEILA N. SWAROOP IN
RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S
JUNE 25, 2014 ORDERS (DKT.
NOS. 218 & 219)

26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AND CERTAIN EXHIBITS CITED
IN THE AMENDED DECLARATION OF SHEILA N. SWAROOP 12-cv- 3393-YGR

1

The Court, having read and considered the Declaration of Sheila N. Swaroop in

2

Response to the Court’s June 25, 2014 Orders (Dkt. Nos. 218 & 219), finds that good cause

3

exists pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 for granting certain exhibits sought to be sealed by

4

the Administrative Motions referenced therein. The Court hereby orders that the

5

Administrative Motions are GRANTED with respect to the following Exhibits marked “Grant”

6

and the portions of the filings citing thereto; GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART with

7

respect to the following Exhibits marked "In part" as set forth in the accompanying footnotes;

8

and DENIED with respect to the following Exhibits marked "Deny" and the portions of the

9

filings citing thereto. Exhibits marked "Denied as Moot" were filed in connection with

10

substantive motions that have since been withdrawn; those exhibits need not be filed in the

11

public record as they played no part in any judicial decision making.

12
13

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO SEAL

14

[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 2
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 3
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 4
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 5
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 6
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 7
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 8
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 9
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 11
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 12
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 16
[Dkt. No. 138] Exhibit 21
[Dkt. No. 155]
[Dkt. No. 184] Exhibit B
[Dkt. No. 184] Exhibit C
[Dkt. No. 184] Exhibit D
[Dkt. No. 184] Exhibit E
[Dkt. No. 184] Exhibit F
[Dkt. No. 184] Exhibit G
[Dkt. No. 186] Exhibit 1
[Dkt. No. 186] Exhibit 2

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

GRANT

DENY

DENIED AS MOOT

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

27
28

1

Defendants withdrew their request to seal this exhibit.

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AND CERTAIN EXHIBITS CITED
IN THE AMENDED DECLARATION OF SHEILA N. SWAROOP 12-cv- 3393-YGR

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO SEAL
[Dkt. No. 186] Exhibit 3
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 7
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 8
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 9
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 10
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 11
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 12
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 15
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 16
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 17
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 18
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 19
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 20
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 21
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 22
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 23
[Dkt. No. 199] Exhibit 26
[Dkt. No. 209] Exhibit B
[Dkt. No. 209] Exhibit C
[Dkt. No. 209] Exhibit E
[Dkt. No. 209] Exhibit J
[Dkt. No. 209] Exhibit M
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit E
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit F
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit G
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit H
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit I
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit J
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit K
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit L

GRANT

DENY

DENIED AS MOOT
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X2
X
X
X
X
X
In part3
X
X
X
X
In part4
X
X
X
In part5
X
X
X
X

20
2

21

Defendants expressly withdrew their request to seal this exhibit.

3

22
23
24
25
26

Bates-stamped pages TR0023923 and TR0023926 of docket number 199, Exhibit
26, are not sealable, and therefore the request to seal that Exhibit is DENIED insofar as it seeks
to seal those pages. The request is otherwise GRANTED.
4

In docket number 209, Exhibit M, the first five paragraphs on bates-stamped page
TR0000020 are not sealable, nor are the first and third full paragraphs on bates-stamped page
TR0000021. The request to seal is therefore DENIED as to those paragraphs, but otherwise
GRANTED.
5

27
28

Docket number 213, Exhibit H, is hereby sealed on bates-stamped page TR0032526
from the Subject line on the top of the page to and through the signature line of the email sent
at 6:23 PM. The remainder of the Exhibit is not sealed.
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AND CERTAIN EXHIBITS CITED
IN THE AMENDED DECLARATION OF SHEILA N. SWAROOP 12-cv- 3393-YGR

1
2

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO SEAL
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit M
[Dkt. No. 213] Exhibit N

GRANT
X
X

DENY

DENIED AS MOOT

3
The clerk shall maintain under Seal the unredacted versions of the Exhibits for which

4
5

the motions to seal are hereby granted, and the portions of the filings citing thereto. The

6

documents herein ordered sealed are so ordered only for purposes of consideration of the

7

motions with which they were submitted. Should any party wish to seal portions of the

8

documents in connection with any later motion or trial, they will need to make a sufficient

9

showing at that time.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated: July 11, 2014
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Court Judge

14
15
16
17

18390862

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AND CERTAIN EXHIBITS CITED
IN THE AMENDED DECLARATION OF SHEILA N. SWAROOP 12-cv- 3393-YGR