Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc. et al

Filing 89

ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF re #88 Joint Discovery Letter Brief on Motion for Order Compelling Production of Documents Responsive to AngioScore's Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 18-24 filed by Eitan Konstantino, Trireme Medical, Inc., Angioscore, Inc. ; SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING for Friday, 11/8/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/1/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
10

ANGIOSCORE, INC.,

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.

Case No.: 12-CV-3393 YGR
ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF
(DKT. NO. 88); SETTING COMPLIANCE
HEARING

TRIREME MEDICAL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

Having duly considered the parties’ Joint Discovery Letter Brief (Dkt. No. 88), the Court

17

GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for complete production of documents responsive to its Requests for

18

Production Nos. 18 through 24, inclusive. Further, the Court STRIKES Defendant’s proffered

19

limitation on production to only those documents relating to the “constraining structure” of the

20

Chocolate PTA Balloon Catheter. Dkt. No. 88-1 at 15:26, 16:13, 18:21. Defendants shall not limit

21

their production to only those documents relating to the constraining structure. If Quattro Vascular

22

is a wholly owned subsidiary of TriReme, TriReme shall produce all responsive documents in its

23

subsidiary’s possession. To the extent a privilege exists, a privilege log must be produced.

24

Defendants shall complete production no later than October 31, 2013.

25

The Court further SETS a compliance hearing for 9:00 a.m. on November 8, 2013,

26

immediately prior to the tutorial in this matter. No later than November 1, 2013, Defendants shall

27

file either (1) a Notice of Compliance with this Order or (2) a one-page joint statement explaining

28

why compliance is not complete. In the event of noncompliance, Defendants shall cause to appear

1

in person at the compliance hearing the person most knowledgeable of the subject documents. The

2

Court may then, in its discretion, conduct an evidentiary hearing on November 1, and, if appropriate,

3

assess sanctions.

4
5

If, however, Defendant timely completes the required production, the Court will vacate the
compliance hearing and no appearances beyond those needed for the tutorial shall be required.

6

This Order terminates docket number 88.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10

Dated: October 1, 2013

__________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2