Tric Tools, Inc. v. TT Technologies, Inc et al

Filing 56

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Granting 54 Stipulation To File First Amended Complaint. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

WEISBERG & MILLER
Craig S. Miller (State Bar No. 139682)
William S. Weisberg (State Bar No. 146284)
654 Sacramento Street, Third Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff TRIC Tools, Inc.

LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P.
David A. Allgeyer (Pro Hac Vice)
Christopher R. Smith (Pro Hac Vice)
4200 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9

654 SACRAMENTO STREET THIRD FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

LAW OFFICES OF

10

WEISBERG & MILLER

PILLSBURY WINTHROP
SHAW PITTMAN LLP
Duane H. Mathiowetz, SBN 111831
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2228
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

11
12

Attorneys for Defendant
TT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

17
TRIC TOOLS, INC.,
18
19

Plaintiff,

20

v.

21
22

TT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and
TRACTO-TECHNIK GMBH & Co.,
KG,

Case No. CV 12-3490 (YGR)
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND
PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND
PROPOSED ORDER
AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT

23
Defendants.

Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

24
25
26
27
28

Page 1 of 2
TRIC Tools, Inc. v. TT Technologies, Inc., et al.
U.S. Dist. Court (ND Cal.) – San Jose Division, Case No. CV 12-03490 PSG
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
DOCS-#3811142-v1

1

Plaintiff TRIC Tools, Inc. and Defendant TT Technologies, Inc., through their counsel

2

of record, stipulate that Plaintiff TRIC Tools, Inc. may file a First Amended Complaint, which

3

is attached as Exhibit A. Defendant does not stipulate to the factual allegations in the First

4

Amended Complaint and expressly reserves all of its rights and defenses, including those

5

related to jurisdiction. The parties further stipulate that Defendant’s answer shall be deemed

6

an answer to the First Amended Complaint such that Defendant need not file an answer to the

7

First Amended Complaint.

8
9

654 SACRAMENTO STREET THIRD FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

LAW OFFICES OF

WEISBERG & MILLER

10

Respectfully submitted,
DATE: December 31, 2012.

11
12
13

/s/ William S. Weisberg
William S. Weisberg, (SBN 146284),
[e-mail],
WEISBERG & MILLER

/s/ Christopher R. Smith
Christopher R. Smith, Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
David Allgeyer, Pro Hac Vice
LINDQUIST & VENNUM LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff TRIC Tools, Inc.

/s/ Duane H. Mathiowetz_______
Duane H. Mathiowetz, (SBN 111931),
[e-mail],
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
PITTMAN LLP

14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendant TT Technologies,
Inc.

18
19
20

SHALL BE
IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: Exhibit A is filed as Plaintiff’s First Amended

21

Complaint, and Defendant TT Technologies, Inc.’s answer on file with the Court shall be

22

deemed Defendant’s answer to the First Amended Complaint.

23
24

THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN JANUARY 15, 2013.
DATED:

JANUARY 8, 2013

25
26

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, U.S. District Court Judge

27
28

PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE

Page 2 of 2
TRIC Tools, Inc. v. TT Technologies, Inc., et al.
U.S. Dist. Court (ND Cal.) – San Jose Division, Case No. CV 12-03490 PSG
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
DOCS-#3811142-v1