Stitt v. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

Filing 190

ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing regarding parties' proposed notice forms is set for Friday, 5/23/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/2/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 DARRYL A. STITT, TONY GRANDBERRY, AND HEDY GRIFFIN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Case No.: 12-CV-3704 YGR ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING Plaintiffs, vs. THE SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, et al., Defendants. TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: A compliance hearing regarding the parties' proposed notice forms shall be held on Friday, May 23, 2014 on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file either: (a) their Joint Proposed Notice Forms, along with a proposed order setting forth stipulated deadlines 19 for Operators to respond to the notices and procedures in the event that notices are returned as 20 undeliverable, or (b) a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation for their failure to 21 comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be 22 taken off calendar. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: May 2, 2014 ____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?