Stitt v. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

Filing 321

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying without prejudice 319 proposed Substitution of Counsel. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2016)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

DARRYL A. STITT, et al.,

8

Plaintiffs,

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No.: 12-cv-03704 YGR
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PROPOSED SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

vs.
Re: Dkt. No. 319
THE SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL
TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, et al.,

12
13

Defendants.

14
15

On March 28, 2016, Defendants filed a Notice of Substitution of Counsel and Proposed Order

16

thereon. (Dkt. No. 319.) The proposed substitution of counsel is hereby DENIED WITHOUT

17

PREJUDICE to Defendants’ proposed new counsel with Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai LLP

18

confirming their ability to maintain the current schedule as set forth in the Amended Case

19

Management and Pretrial Order (Dkt. No. 318).

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: March 29, 2016

_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE