Stitt v. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

Filing 405

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying without prejudice 401 Administrative Motion for Administrative Relief re Reply Papers and Setting Hearing Date. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2016)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

DARRYL A. STITT, TONY GRANDBERRY, and
HEDY GRIFFIN, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,

8

Plaintiffs,

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Case No.: 12-CV-03704 YGR
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND
SETTING HEARING DATE
RE: DKT. NO. 401

vs.
THE SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL
TRANSPORTATION AGENCY; CITY AND COUNTY
OF SAN FRANCISCO; AND DOES 1-20,
Defendants.

14
15

Plaintiffs have filed an administrative motion for relief regarding defendant’s reply papers

16

and hearing date. (Dkt. No. 401.) Having considered the memorandum and declarations, the record
17
18

in this case, and for good cause shown, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE plaintiffs’ motion

19

requesting permission to file sur-replies. The Court will order further briefing should it determine

20

such briefing necessary.

21

Furthermore, the hearings on the four motions currently scheduled for September 13, 2016

22

(i.e., Defendant’s Motion to Decertify Collective Action and Class Action (Dkt. 336), Defendant’s
23
24

Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 360), and both sides’ Daubert motions (Dkt. 359, 361), are

25

VACATED. The hearings for all four motions shall be set for September 9, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: August 29, 2016
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE