Jongerius Panoramic Technologies, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 125

ORDER ON DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF re 122 Statement, filed by Google Inc, Jongerius Panoramic Technologies, LLC, Apple Inc. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/18/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 JONGERIUS PANORAMIC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ORDER ON DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF 7 Plaintiff(s), 8 9 Case No.: 12-CV-03797 YGR vs. GOOGLE INC. et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 The Court has reviewed the parties’ Statement of Discovery and Case Management Issues Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 (Dkt. No. 122) and makes the following rulings: 14 (1) The scope of Defendants’ Phase I production obligations: To the extent requested, the 15 Court is not inclined to Order Defendants to produce all of the documents identified in Exhibit A. 16 (2) The identification of individuals on Google’s initial disclosures: Google must supplement 17 its initial disclosures to provide the name of each individual likely to have discoverable information.1 18 (3) The bifurcation of discovery related to damages: Damages discovery is STAYED pending 19 further Order of the Court. (4) The scheduling of motions for summary judgment of non-infringement: The request to file 20 21 an early motion for summary judgment regarding non-infringement is DENIED. (5) Specific provisions in the Parties’ Protective Order: 22 23  The Court Adopts Plaintiff’s language in paragraphs: 7.4(a), 8(A), 8(B) & 9(d); 24  The Court Adopts Defendants’ language in paragraphs: 8(C) & 9(c); 25  With respect to paragraph 9(e), the limitation on copies is four (4). 26 27 28 1 Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) Google must disclose “the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have discoverable information—along with the subjects of that information—that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). Failing to disclose may lead to exclusion of withheld material, whether to support a motion or at trial. 1 2 3 In the future, the parties must provide the Court with a form of order on all issues on which the Court must rule. The Court will take no further action on the parties’ Statement of Discovery and Case 4 Management Issues. To the extent that there are other issues that remain, the parties are ordered to 5 meet and confer to resolve those issues. The parties are expected to comply with the Court’s standing 6 order on discovery disputes. 7 This Order terminates Dkt. No. 122. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: December 18, 2012 10 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?