Jongerius Panoramic Technologies, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
153
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 143 Motion for Leave to File; granting 146 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; Adopting Parties' Proposed Schedule re 151 Stipulation. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2013)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
JONGERIUS PANORAMIC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
vs.
GOOGLE INC. et al.,
11
Case No.: 12-CV-03797 YGR
ORDER ADOPTING PARTIES’ PROPOSED
SCHEDULE; ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PLEADING;
AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
Defendant(s).
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
The Court has reviewed the parties’ Agreed Proposed Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 119-1)
13
14
and ADOPTS those dates as the Case Management Order for this case and all parties shall comply
15
with its provisions. In addition, the Court makes the further orders stated below:
(1) Pursuant to the Stipulation For Extension of Claim Construction Discovery and Briefing
16
17
Schedule:
18
(a) claim construction discovery will close on April 29, 2013;
19
(b) Plaintiff’s opening claim construction brief is due on May 13, 2013;
20
(c) Defendants’ responsive claim construction brief is due June 7, 2013; and
21
(d) Plaintiff’s reply claim construction brief is due June 21, 2013.
(2) Furthermore, the Court sets the following dates for the Technology Tutorial and Claim
22
23
Construction Hearing1:
24
(a) Technology Tutorial on July 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.; and
25
(b) Claim Construction Hearing on July 17, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.
(3) To the extent that leave of Court is required, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File the
26
27
Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 143) that it filed on February 13, 2013 is GRANTED.2
28
1
Defendant(s) will present first, although the parties may make a joint presentation at the technology tutorial.
1
According to the parties’ Revised Joint Case Management Statement: “The parties agree that the
2
date for the filing of amended pleadings in the Proposed Docket Control Order, attached to this CMC
3
Statement as Exhibit A, should be February 13, 2013. Thereafter, the parties may amend the
4
pleadings only with leave of the Court.” (Dkt. No. 119 at 6.) Plaintiff filed its Second Amended
5
Complaint on February 13, 2013 and the Court has adopted the parties’ agreed upon deadline of
6
February 13, 2013 to amend the pleadings.
7
(4) Google Inc.’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. No. 146) is GRANTED.
8
This Order terminates Dkt. Nos. 143, 146 & 151.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated: April 5, 2013
11
_____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this motion
appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing set for April 30,
2013.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?