Wells Fargo & Company et al v. ABD Insurance & Financial Services, Inc. et al
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 22 Motion to Shorten Time (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2012)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
WELLS FARGO AND CO., et al.,
6
7
8
Plaintiff(s),
v.
No. C 12-3856 PJH
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME
ABD INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL
SERVICES, et al.,
9
10
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
11
12
Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to shorten time for briefing and hearing of their
13
motion to expedite discovery, noticed for hearing in accordance with Local Rule 7-2 on
14
September 12, 2012. Plaintiffs seek to have the motion heard on August 22, 2012. The
15
court finds that in the absence of a clear showing of any “substantial harm or prejudice” that
16
would occur if the court does not change the time, an expedited hearing with its
17
concomitant abbreviated period for the defendants’ opposition to be filed and for the court
18
to prepare for the hearing, is simply not warranted. The motion is DENIED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 14, 2012
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?