Ellis et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 130

ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing re parties need for deadline extension is set for Friday, 12/12/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/20/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DIANA ELLIS, ET AL., Case No. 12-cv-03897-YGR Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING 9 10 J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 The Court, having considered the parties’ renewed request for a pretrial conference and 14 Judge Spero’s recent discovery rulings, hereby SETS a compliance hearing regarding the parties’ 15 present need for deadline extensions. (Dkt. No. 111.) Said hearing shall be held on Friday, 16 December 12, 2014, on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay 17 Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1. 18 Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file 19 either: (a) a Joint Statement summarizing the status of the litigation and apprising the Court of any 20 need for deadline extensions, and if so, an accompanying proposed form of order; or (b) a one- 21 page Joint Statement setting forth an explanation for their failure to comply. If compliance is 22 complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. 23 24 Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: November 20, 2014 27 28 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?