Hurt v. United States of America
Filing
17
ORDER re IFP complaint. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/13/2012. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2012)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
ORDER RE IFP COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 12-4096 PJH
Defendant.
_______________________________/
12
13
The complaint in this case was filed on August 2, 2012, along with an application to
14
proceed in forma pauperis. The court reviewed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e),
15
and determined that plaintiff “alleges no clear facts in support of his complaint, states no
16
legitimate basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, and does not identify any
17
recognizable causes of action.” See Dkt. 8 (Aug. 23, 2012). As a result, the court
18
dismissed the complaint, but granted leave to amend. Specific instructions on how to
19
amend were provided in the dismissal order and a deadline of September 21, 2012 was
20
set. The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed the amended complaint as ordered.
21
Indeed, instead of filing an amended complaint, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on
22
September 10, 2012. The appeal has since been dismissed, and this case is still pending.
23
Rather than issue an order to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed with
24
prejudice for failing to file an amended complaint, the court will afford plaintiff one final
25
opportunity to amend his complaint in accordance with this court’s order of August 23,
26
2012. The amended complaint must be filed no later than December 7, 2012 or the matter
27
will be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: November 13, 2012
3
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?