Golden Gate Village Election Committee et al v. Marin Housing Authority et al
Filing
74
ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing set for 3/28/2014 is CONTINUED to Friday, 4/4/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/25/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2014)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
GOLDEN GATE VILLAGE ELECTION
COMMITTEE, ET AL.,
ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING
8
9
10
11
Case No.: 12-CV-4226 YGR
Plaintiffs,
vs.
MARIN HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al.,
Defendants.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
13
On January 27, 2014, the Court issued an Order vacating hearing dates and setting a
14
compliance hearing for Friday, March 28, 2014. On March 21, 2014, the parties filed a joint
15
statement apprising the Court of the status of settlement proceedings; specifically, that a settlement
16
agreement was signed on March 20, 2014 and that the parties are diligently working toward dismissal
17
of this action. (See Dkt. No. 73.)
18
Accordingly, the Court hereby CONTINUES the compliance hearing to April 4, 2014. Five (5)
19
business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file either (a) a Stipulation
20
of Dismissal; or (b) a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation regarding the failure
21
to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be
22
taken off calendar.
23
Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a
24
timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 25, 2014
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?