Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated v. Intel Corporation

Filing 81

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 79 Stipulation, filed by Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated, Intel Corporation, 78 MOTION for Entry of Tutorial and Hearing Demonstratives onto Case Docket filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/19/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

James F. Valentine (SBN 149269)
[e-mail]
James C. Pistorino (SBN 226496)
[e-mail]
Kenneth J. Halpern (SBN 187663)
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.838.4350
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant
INTEL CORPORATION

DUNCAN M. MCNEILL (SBN 136416)
[e-mail]
1514 Van Dyke Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94124
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED

9
10

DAVID FINK (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
7519 Apache Plume
Houston, TX 77071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18

FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTEL CORPORATION,

Case No. 12-CV-4413 YGR
STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF INTEL
CORPORATION’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF TUTORIAL
AND HEARING DEMONSTRATIVES
ONTO CASE DOCKET

Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20336-1454/LEGAL28451014.1

STIPULATION ISO INTEL’S ADMIN. MTN. FOR ENTRY OF
DEMONSTRATIVES ONTO CASE DOCKET
CASE NO. 12-cv-4413 YGR

1

On October 2, 2013, a claim construction tutorial was held in this case. Dkt. No. 70. On

2

October 9, a claim construction hearing and a hearing on Intel’s motion for summary judgment of

3

invalidity on grounds of patent ineligibility were held. Dkt. No. 71. Each of Intel’s tutorial,

4

claim construction hearing argument, and patent ineligibility argument included a presentation of

5

slides. Intel’s tutorial presentation also included animations.

6

Pursuant to the Court’s November 6, 2013 order regarding claim construction and patent

7

ineligibility (Dkt. Nos. 74-76), Intel submitted a proposed final judgment on November 14. Dkt.

8

No. 77. The judgment, if entered, will be final and appealable.

9

The parties hereby stipulate to entry of Intel’s slide presentations of October 2 and 9,

10

2013 onto the case docket and assignment of docket numbers thereto, and respectfully request

11

that the Court enter an order placing those items on the docket.

12

Dated: November 18, 2013

By:

13
14

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
INTEL CORPORATION

15
16

Dated: November 18, 2013

By:

17
18

/s/ David Fink
David Fink
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED

19
20

/s/ James F. Valentine
James F. Valentine
[e-mail]

I, James F. Valentine, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

22

S
Dated: November 18, 2013
TE

November 19, 2013

FO

o ge r s

LI

ER

nzalez R

/s/ James F. Valentine
James F. Valentine
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
INTEL CORPORATION

R NIA

D
RDERE

onne Go
Judge Yv

H

28

RT

27

NO

26

OO
IT IS S

By:

A

25

UNIT
ED

24

TA

DISTRIC
TC

RT
U
O

23

S

21

N

OF
D IS
20336-1454/LEGAL28451014.1 T R I C T

C

1

STIPULATION ISO INTEL’S ADMIN. MTN. FOR
ENTRY OF DEMONSTRATIVES ONTO CASE DOCKET
CASE NO. 12-cv-4413 YGR