Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated v. Intel Corporation
Filing
90
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 88 Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal by January 27, 2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2014)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
10
vs.
Case No.: 12-CV-04413 YGR
ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF PLAINTIFF
FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL
INTEL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
On January 13, 2014, Plaintiff Fuzzysharp Technologies, Inc. filed its Motion for Extension
12
of Time to File Notice of Appeal. (Dkt. No. 88.) Defendant Intel Corporation filed its opposition
13
to the motion. (Dkt. No. 89.)
14
Having carefully considered the papers submitted in support and in opposition, the Court
15
hereby GRANTS the Motion for Extension of Time. The Court has discretion, under Rule
16
4(a)(5)(A)(ii), to grant an extension of time to file a notice of appeal upon a showing of excusable
17
neglect. See Pioneer Inv. Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. Partnership, 507 U.S. 380
18
(1993). Plaintiff has offered evidence to support his argument that his failure to file a notice of
19
appeal by the deadline of Friday, January 10, 2014, was due to his excusable neglect. Intel
20
concedes that there is no real danger of prejudice or impact on the proceedings due to Plaintiff
21
missing the deadline by not filing on January 10.
22
Thus the request for extension is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file any Notice of Appeal no
23
later than January 27, 2014.
24
This Order terminates Docket No. 88.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Date: January 23, 2014
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?