Chanel, Inc. v. Zhang et al
Filing
58
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 10/21/2013. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CHANEL INC.,
8
Plaintiff,
No. C 12-4428 PJH
9
v.
10
JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT
INJUNCTION
ZHANG YANG, et al.,
11
12
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
The court having granted plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment,
14
it is Ordered and Adjudged
15
that judgment be entered in the sum of $105,350 in favor of plaintiff and against
16
defendant, together with post-judgment interest, and that the action be dismissed.
17
Additionally, the court enters the following permanent injunction against defendant:
18
Defendant and his officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and all persons
19
acting in concert and participation with Defendant are hereby permanently restrained and
20
enjoined from:
21
a. manufacturing or causing to be manufactured, importing, advertising, or
22
promoting, distributing, selling or offering to sell counterfeit and infringing goods
23
using Plaintiff’s trademarks identified in Paragraph 13 of the Complaint (“the
24
Plaintiff’s Marks”);
25
b. using the Plaintiff’s Marks in connection with the sale of any unauthorized goods;
26
c. using any logo, and/or layout which may be calculated to falsely advertise the
27
services or products of Defendant offered for sale or sold via the domain names
28
identified in Appendix A hereto (collectively the “Subject Domain Names”) and/or any
1
other website or business, as being sponsored by, authorized by, endorsed by, or in
2
any way associated with Plaintiff;
3
d. falsely representing themselves as being connected with Plaintiff, through
4
sponsorship or association;
5
e. engaging in any act which is likely to falsely cause members of the trade and/or of
6
the purchasing public to believe any goods or services of Defendant offered for sale
7
or sold via the Subject Domain Names and/or any other website or business are in
8
any way endorsed by, approved by, and/or associated with Plaintiff;
9
f. using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the Plaintiff’s
10
Marks in connection with the publicity, promotion, sale, or advertising of any goods
11
sold by Defendant via the Subject Domain Names and/or any other website or
12
business, including, without limitation, handbags, wallets, shoes, boots, cosmetics,
13
sunglasses, clothing, watches, or costume jewelry, including necklaces, bracelets,
14
earrings, brooches, and rings;
15
g. affixing, applying, annexing or using in connection with the sale of any goods, a
16
false description or representation, including words or other symbols tending to
17
falsely describe or represent goods offered for sale or sold by Defendant via the
18
Subject Domain Names and/or any other website or business, as being those of
19
Plaintiff or in any way endorsed by Plaintiff;
20
h. otherwise unfairly competing with Plaintiff;
21
i. effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations or utilizing
22
any other device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the
23
prohibitions set forth above; and
24
j. using the Plaintiff’s Marks, or any confusingly similar trademarks, within domain
25
name extensions, metatags or other markers within website source code, from use
26
on any webpage (including as the title of any web page), any advertising links to
27
other websites, from search engines’ databases or cache memory, and any other
28
form of use of such terms which is visible to a computer user or serves to direct
1
computer searches to websites registered by, owned, or operated by Defendant,
2
including the Internet websites operating under all of the Subject Domain Names.
3
The court also orders the following equitable relief:
4
a. In order to give practical effect to the Permanent Injunction, the Subject Domain
5
Names are hereby ordered to be immediately transferred by Defendant, his
6
assignees and/or successors in interest or title, and the Registrars to Plaintiff’s
7
control. To the extent the current Registrars do not facilitate the transfer of the
8
domain names to Plaintiff’s control within five (5) days of receipt of this judgment,
9
the Registries shall, within thirty (30) days, change the Registrar of Record for the
10
Subject Domain Names to a Registrar of Plaintiff’s choosing, and that Registrar shall
11
transfer the Subject Domain Names to Plaintiff;
12
b. Upon Plaintiff’s request, the top level domain (TLD) Registry for each of the
13
Subject Domain Names, within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Order, shall place
14
the Subject Domain Names on Registry Hold status for the life of the current
15
registration, thus removing them from the TLD zone files maintained by the Registry
16
which link the Subject Domain Names to the IP addresses where the associated
17
websites are hosted; and
18
c. Upon Plaintiff’s request, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
19
Numbers (“ICANN”) shall take all actions necessary to ensure that the top level
20
domain Registry responsible for the Subject Domain Names transfers and/or
21
disables the Subject Domain Names.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: October 21, 2013
_________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?