Den Beste et al

Filing 12

ORDER Extending Time to File Reply Brief. Appellant Reply Brief due by 12/5/2012. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/27/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (nahS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

In re PAUL AND MELODY DEN BESTE,

No. C 12-4522 PJH
Bankr. Case No. 10-13558

8
9

Debtors.
______________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
FILE REPLY BRIEF

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
Debtor/appellant Paul Den Beste, appearing pro se, has filed a Notice of Awaiting
12
Reset Vacated Briefing Schedule to File Appellant’s Reply Brief, noting that his reply brief
13
was due November 21, 2012, and seeking a new briefing schedule regarding his reply
14
brief. Doc. no. 11. As debtor recognizes, the order entered November 14, 2012 vacated
15
only the briefing schedule and hearing date noticed for the motion for sanctions. The court
16
did not vacate the briefing deadline for debtors’ reply brief, which was not timely filed.
17
Although debtors have not requested an extension of time by which to file the reply
18
brief in support of their appeal, the court sua sponte extends the deadline to file the reply
19
brief to December 5, 2012. As of that date, the appeal will be deemed submitted
20
regardless of whether debtors file a reply brief.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated: November 27, 2012
23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge