Sanchez et al v. H&R Plumbing and Drain Cleaning, Inc. et al

Filing 8

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 7 Motion to Continue Case Management Conference.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555 DAL BON & MARGAIN, APC 28 NORTH 1ST SUITE 700 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 TEL (408) 297-4729 FAX (408) 297-4728 4 margainlaw@hotmail.com 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs FRANCIS SANCHEZ, JOSE L. SANCHEZ, ROBERTO A. CALLES, and ERIC ORTIZ CRUZ 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 Case No.: CV 12-04588 DMR FRANCIS SANCHEZ, JOSE L. SANCHEZ, ROBERTO A. CALLES, and ERIC ORTIZ CRUZ, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16-2(d); DECLARATION OF TOMAS E. MARGAIN IN SUPPORT THEREOF; and PROPOSED ORDER Plaintiff, v. 15 16 17 18 H&R PLUMBING AND DRAIN CLEANING, INC.; CITY OF BRENTWOOD, MOUNTAIN VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT; WESTERN SURETY COMPANY; and AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY 19 20 21 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES WHO HAVE MADE AN APPEARANCE IN 22 THIS ACTION 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 16-2(d), as well as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs 24 hereby requests that the initial Case Management Conference set for December 5, 2012 be 25 continued to January 9, 2013 or the next available Wednesday on the Court’s calendar. As 1 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC 1 described in the below Declaration of Tomas E. Margain, good cause exists. Counsel for 2 Defendant H&R PLUMBING AND DRAIN CLEANING, INC. (“H&R Plumbing”) needs time 3 to pick up the defense of the surety Defendants WESTERN SURETY COMPANY and 4 AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY and get their consent to have a 5 Magistrate hear this matter. Moreover, counsel need to put in place a mechanism by which funds 6 held by public agency Defendants, CITY OF BRENTWOOD can MOUNTAIN VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT, can be deposited in an escrow account so that those Defendants can be 7 dismissed. As such, a continuance will allow both of these events to occur with the goal of 8 having the pleadings settled by the Case management conference. Plaintiffs and Defendant H&R 9 Plumbing have also been engaged in information exchanges as part of settlement 10 communications and the continuance will also allow the parties to continue to focus on this. 11 12 Dated: November 16, 2012 By: //s// TOMAS E. MARGAIN TOMAS E. MARGAIN 13 14 DECLARATION OF TOMAS E. MARGAIN 15 I, TOMAS E. MARGAIN, declare as follows: 16 17 18 19 1. I am an attorney duly authorized to practice before this Court and Plaintiffs’ attorney of record in this action. I base this declaration on my personal knowledge unless otherwise indicated. 2. Defendant H&R PLUMBING AND DRAIN CLEANING, INC. is being 20 represented by Jeff McClure of Davenport Gerstner & McClure with whom I have litigated 21 employment wage and hour cases in the past and who I know to be experienced in public works 22 litigation cases such as the matter at hand. 23 24 3. I have spoken with Mr. McClure about the litigation in a substantive manner and we have exchanged numerous e-mails. We have agreed to both try to investigate the claims to 25 2 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC 1 aid our clients in settlement and to simplify the procedural posture of the case at this point due to 2 the number of Defendants. 3 4. I have spoken to and e-mailed counsel for the two public entity defendants which 4 are holding construction funds based on about $36,000.00 in Stop Notices filed by the four 5 Plaintiffs. The only role they have in the litigation is to be told by the Plaintiffs, based on a 6 release, or the Court, based on a judgment, how to transmit these funds. As such, I 7 communicated to both of these counsel and to Mr. McClure that we are going to draft a 8 stipulation and order allowing the entities to transmit the funds to Mr. McClure’s trust account 9 and dismiss the entities. We are going to work on drafting this document by the end of the 10 month to have a mechanism in place such that the funds can only be disbursed by Court order. 11 The goal is to dismiss the public entitles so that they will not incur any litigation costs. 12 5. Plaintiffs have also sued two sureties who issued Payment Bonds to which claims 13 attach. It is anticipated that both of the sureties will tender the claim for a defense to H&R 14 Plumbing. In speaking with Mr. McClure on November 14, 2012 during our Rule 26 15 conference, one surety has already tendered the claim and he is working to have the second 16 surety tender the claim. Mr. McClure needs a continuance for this to occur and also to have the 17 Defendants make a decision on consenting to a Magistrate. The goal is to have Mr. McClure 18 respond to the Complaint as to these two Defendants and H&R Plumbing. 19 20 21 22 6. Counsel have also been able to have two preliminary discussions and are working on a document exchange to determine the value of the case from each side’s perspective. A continuance will allow the parties to continue to do this with the aim to settlement the case or to recommend mediation at an early stage. By making this statement, I am not implying that Defendants are conceding any liability but I have found the conversations productive to allow 23 counsel to assess the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s case. 24 25 3 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC 7. 1 Mr. McClure and I spoke about my intent to seek a continuance and we both 2 looked at our calendars and decided that a continuance to a CMC date from January 7 to 14 fit 3 our calendars and I chose the 9th based on the Court’s calendar. I declare under penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing 4 5 is true and accurate. Executed on November 16, 2012 in San Jose, Santa Clara California. By: ____//s// Tomas Margain__________ Tomas E. Margain 6 7 8 ARGUMENT 9 10 The Court has the authority to continue hearings and a party may seek a continuance under Local Rule 16. Here, counsel have meet and conferred on the continued date. Counsel 11 have also agreed that there is good cause as the continuance will allow parties to be dismissed 12 and the three remaining defendants represented by one counsel. 13 14 Dated: November 16, 2012 15 16 By: //s// TOMAS E. MARGAIN TOMAS E. MARGAIN 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 Case No.: CV 12-04588 DMR FRANCIS SANCHEZ, JOSE L. SANCHEZ, ROBERTO A. CALLES, and ERIC ORTIZ CRUZ, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16-2(d) 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 v. 17 18 19 20 H&R PLUMBING AND DRAIN CLEANING, INC.; CITY OF BRENTWOOD, MOUNTAIN VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT; WESTERN SURETY COMPANY; and AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY 21 22 23 24 BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE, THE COURT’S FILE AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 25 5 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC The initial Case Management Conference and Rule 26 Deadlines are continued as follows: 1 December 20, 2012 2 3 • Last Day to Meet and Confer Regarding Initial Discloses, ADR process election and discovery plan. 4 5 • Last Day to file ADR Certificate signed by Parties and Counsel. 6 • Last Day to either file a stipulation to ARD Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone 7 Conference. 8 9 January 2, 2013 10 • Last Day to File Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures and file Joint Case 11 Management Statement 12 Last Day to File Magistrate Consent Form 13 • 14 January 9, 2012 15 • Initial Case Management Conference in Courtroom 4,3rd Floor, Oakland Courthouse at Nov. 20, 2012 By: O OR IT IS S on Judge D DERED Hon. Donna M. Ryu Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court Ryu 20 RT 21 na M. ER 23 24 25 6 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC A H 22 FO 19 N D IS T IC T R R NIA DATED: LI 18 S IT IS SO ORDERED UNIT ED 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 1:30 p.m. NO 16 OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?