In re Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. Securities Litigation

Filing 50

ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re 49 Notice of Substitution of Counsel, filed by Charles J. Fitzgerald, Robert J. Pera, Peter Y. Chung, John Ritchie, Robert M. Van Buskirk, Christopher J. Crespi, Ubiquiti Networks, Inc., John L. Ocampo. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/7/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 TIMOTHY P. CRUDO, State Bar No. 143835 Email: timothy.crudo@lw.com LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 Attorneys for Defendants Ubiquiti Networks, Inc., Robert J. Pera, John Ritchie, Peter Y. Chung, Christopher J. Crespi, Charles J. Fitzgerald, John L. Ocampo, and Robert M. Van Buskirk 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 In re UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) __________________________________________ ) ) This Document Relates To: ) ) ALL ACTIONS. ) ) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 12-cv-04677-YGR Case No.: 12-cv-04677-YGR NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that attorney Ignacio E. Salceda of the law firm Wilson 2 Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC, located at 650 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, hereby 3 withdraws from representing defendants Ubiquiti Networks, Inc., Robert J. Pera, John Ritchie, 4 Peter Y. Chung, Christopher J. Crespi, Charles J. Fitzgerald, John L. Ocampo, and Robert M. 5 Van Buskirk (“Ubiquiti Defendants”). Consistent with Local Civil Rule 11-5, notice of this 6 withdrawal and substitution has been provided to plaintiffs. 7 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5, the Ubiquiti Defendants request that the Court approve 8 this substitution. The Ubiquiti Defendants further request, pursuant to General Order 45, that the 9 Court enter an order reflecting this change and that all necessary changes be made to the Court’s 10 records and ECF, and that all future communications regarding this case be directed to the 11 following: 12 13 14 15 16 17 Peter A. Wald, State Bar No. 85705 Email: peter.wald@lw.com Timothy P. Crudo, State Bar No. 143835 Email: timothy.crudo@lw.com Gavin M. Masuda, State Bar No. 260480 Email: gavin.masuda@lw.com Latham & Watkins LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 18 19 Dated: January 3, 2013 20 21 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP By: /s/ Timothy P. Crudo Timothy P. Crudo 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 22 23 Attorneys for Defendants Ubiquiti Networks, Inc., Robert J. Pera, John Ritchie, Peter Y. Chung, Christopher J. Crespi, Charles J. Fitzgerald, John L. Ocampo, and Robert M. Van Buskirk 24 25 26 27 28 1 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 12-cv-04677-YGR 1 Dated: January 3, 2013 2 3 WILSON SONCINI GOODRICH & ROSATI By: /s/ Ignacio E. Salceda ________ Ignacio E. Salceda 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 320-4908 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 *** I, Timothy P. Crudo, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Notice of Substitution of Counsel and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with Local Rule 51(i)(3), I hereby attest that Ignacio E. Salceda has concurred in this filing. 11 By: /s/ Timothy P. Crudo 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 12-cv-04677-YGR [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5 and in accordance with General Order 45, the Court approves the substitution of counsel sought by the Ubiquiti Defendants. 4 DATED: January 7, 2013 5 The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 12-cv-04677-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?