In re Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. Securities Litigation
Filing
50
ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re 49 Notice of Substitution of Counsel, filed by Charles J. Fitzgerald, Robert J. Pera, Peter Y. Chung, John Ritchie, Robert M. Van Buskirk, Christopher J. Crespi, Ubiquiti Networks, Inc., John L. Ocampo. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/7/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TIMOTHY P. CRUDO, State Bar No. 143835
Email: timothy.crudo@lw.com
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 391-0600
Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
Attorneys for Defendants Ubiquiti Networks,
Inc., Robert J. Pera, John Ritchie, Peter Y.
Chung, Christopher J. Crespi, Charles J.
Fitzgerald, John L. Ocampo, and Robert M. Van
Buskirk
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
In re UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
)
)
)
__________________________________________
)
)
This Document Relates To:
)
)
ALL ACTIONS.
)
)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO.: 12-cv-04677-YGR
Case No.: 12-cv-04677-YGR
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF
COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that attorney Ignacio E. Salceda of the law firm Wilson
2
Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC, located at 650 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, hereby
3
withdraws from representing defendants Ubiquiti Networks, Inc., Robert J. Pera, John Ritchie,
4
Peter Y. Chung, Christopher J. Crespi, Charles J. Fitzgerald, John L. Ocampo, and Robert M.
5
Van Buskirk (“Ubiquiti Defendants”). Consistent with Local Civil Rule 11-5, notice of this
6
withdrawal and substitution has been provided to plaintiffs.
7
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5, the Ubiquiti Defendants request that the Court approve
8
this substitution. The Ubiquiti Defendants further request, pursuant to General Order 45, that the
9
Court enter an order reflecting this change and that all necessary changes be made to the Court’s
10
records and ECF, and that all future communications regarding this case be directed to the
11
following:
12
13
14
15
16
17
Peter A. Wald, State Bar No. 85705
Email: peter.wald@lw.com
Timothy P. Crudo, State Bar No. 143835
Email: timothy.crudo@lw.com
Gavin M. Masuda, State Bar No. 260480
Email: gavin.masuda@lw.com
Latham & Watkins LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 391-0600
Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
18
19
Dated: January 3, 2013
20
21
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
By: /s/ Timothy P. Crudo
Timothy P. Crudo
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 391-0600
Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
22
23
Attorneys for Defendants Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.,
Robert J. Pera, John Ritchie, Peter Y. Chung,
Christopher J. Crespi, Charles J. Fitzgerald, John L.
Ocampo, and Robert M. Van Buskirk
24
25
26
27
28
1
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO.: 12-cv-04677-YGR
1
Dated: January 3, 2013
2
3
WILSON SONCINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
By: /s/ Ignacio E. Salceda
________
Ignacio E. Salceda
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: (650) 320-4908
Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
***
I, Timothy P. Crudo, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
Notice of Substitution of Counsel and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with Local Rule 51(i)(3), I hereby attest that Ignacio E. Salceda has concurred in this filing.
11
By: /s/ Timothy P. Crudo
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO.: 12-cv-04677-YGR
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5 and in accordance with General Order 45, the
Court approves the substitution of counsel sought by the Ubiquiti Defendants.
4
DATED: January 7, 2013
5
The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO.: 12-cv-04677-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?