Robertson v. Struffert
Filing
66
ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/8/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
WAYNE J. ROBERTSON,
Case No. 12-cv-04698-JSW
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS
9
10
W. STRUFFERT, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case
13
Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further
14
ORDERED that:
15
A.
DATES
16
Jury Trial Date: Monday, September 28, 2015, at 8:00 a.m., 4 - 6 days
17
Jury Selection: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 8:00 a.m.
18
Pretrial Conference: Monday, August 31, 2015, at 2:00 p.m.
19
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, June 19, 2015, at 9:00 A.M.
20
Last Day for Expert Discovery: April 6, 2015
21
Last Day for Expert Disclosure: March 13, 2015
22
Close of Non-expert Discovery: January 30, 2015
23
B.
DISCOVERY
24
The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to
25
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses
26
pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non-
27
expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all
28
supplementation has been completed.
1
C.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
2
This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Vadas to conduct a settlement conference
3
to be completed by January 23, 2015. Counsel will be contacted by that judge's chambers with a
4
date and time for the conference.
5
D.
PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER
6
No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its
7
own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)
8
without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline
9
contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may
10
not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change
12
in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court
13
will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set
14
by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated: October 8, 2014
18
19
20
______________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?