Pension Plan for Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers et al v. Yubacon, Inc. et al
Filing
86
ORDER to Submit Supplemental Briefing in Support of 77 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/26/2014. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
PENSION PLAN,
12
Plaintiff(s),
13
v.
14
ORDER TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [DOCKET
NO. 77]
YUBACON INC,
15
No. C-12-04738 DMR
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
On August 21, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a motion for default judgment as to Defendants AM
18
Pacific Engineering, Inc. and MV2 Energy, Inc., which is set for hearing on October 9, 2014
19
[Docket No. 77.] Having reviewed that motion, the court orders Plaintiffs to submit a more detailed
20
accounting sufficient to support Plaintiffs’ requested award of reasonable attorneys’ fees for
21
litigating this action, such that the court may determine whether the time spent was “excessive,
22
redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.” Hensley v. Eckerhart , 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983); see also
23
N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 54-5. Such briefing shall be filed by no later than October 9, 2014.
24
Immediately upon receipt of this Order, Plaintiffs shall serve Defendants with a copy of
25
this Order and file a proof of service with the court. Plaintiffs shall also serve Defendants with
26
the requested briefing and file a proof of service with the court.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
UNIT
ED
onn
Judge D
7
8
9
10
11
For the Northern District of California
ER
H
6
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
u
FO
a M. Ry
LI
RT
5
R NIA
I
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
4
United States District Court
ERED
A
3
ORD
T IS SO
NO
Dated: September 26, 2014
2
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?